I have nothing to do these days and am working on the front-end. I am not very familiar with the compatibility of IE6. When I checked online, I found a lot of densely packed text, all written a few years ago. I want to use common compatibility information, which ones are mainly used, and it is mainly explained by running examples. Sometimes these can be very popular. Feel free to recommend to me a CSS standard writing method to reduce compatibility issues.
Too many. Just search it yourself.
ie6 bug css
Ie6 has basically been eliminated, don’t worry about it. It’s like you can basically ignore the compatibility of Windows 2000 now
When I wrote it, I used JS pop-up window directly. Your browser version is too low. . . IE6 has tortured all front-ends. Now you don’t have to worry about it. IE6 is rare
When I wrote it, I directly used JS pop-up windows. Your browser version is too low. . . IE6 has tortured all front-ends, so there is no need to worry now, there are very few IE6s. No, we usually test in IE6, so if you say so, all browsers are now standard.
Is there no browser compatibility issue? IE6 has basically been eliminated, so don’t worry about it. It's like you can basically ignore the compatibility of Windows 2000 now
The compatibility of IE6 is the worst. It is recommended to use Firefox, which is very close to the latest W3C standard.
IE6 has the worst compatibility. It is recommended to use Firefox, which is very close to the latest W3C standard.
Firefox? Nokia in the browser. It might have been okay 3 years ago, but now...
Google search:
firefox css hack has 5,490,000 records
chrome css hack has 711,000 records
So chrome is the first choice for web page production, and IE8 is the second choice. Then follow the order of safari, firefox, ie9, and opera. . .
Chrome css hack has 711,000 records
Therefore, chrome is the first choice for web page creation, followed by IE8, and then safari, firefox,...
It seems that I am out. However, the data you provided is not very accurate.
When searching on Google, you must add "" to the keyword to get the correct number of search results.
Otherwise, the number of records that only satisfy firefox, only css, and only hack are included
firefox css hack found about 124,000 results (taking 0.09 seconds)
chrome css hack found about 43,500 Results (Took 0.29 seconds)
There is nothing to find. If you encounter any problems in actual combat, just solve them
IE6 CSS does not support many syntaxes
I think this depends on the actual situation. Try to avoid using incompatible familiarity! !
:hover IE6 does not support it, you recommend its use but you do not recommend it
IE6 does not support translucent png images, do you think you should use it
There are too many such things, the conclusion is, you Write your own and take care of most browsers
You can finally come up with a fallback plan,
