Web Front-end
HTML Tutorial
Performance consumption comparison: Which one consumes more resources, reflow or redraw?
Performance consumption comparison: Which one consumes more resources, reflow or redraw?
Reflow and redraw: Which one consumes more performance?
In front-end development, performance optimization is an important issue. One of the performance bottlenecks is the browser's reflow and repaint operations. In this article, we'll explore the definitions of reflow and redraw and compare their performance penalties with concrete code examples.
Reflow refers to the process by which the browser recalculates the position and geometric properties of page elements. When the layout changes or the style attributes change, the browser needs to recalculate the position and size of the element. This process is called reflow. Reflow will cause the entire rendering tree to be rebuilt, which is very performance consuming.
Redrawing refers to the process in which the browser redraws elements based on the latest style calculations without affecting the layout. Redrawing does not cause layout changes, it only affects the style of the element. However, the redrawing process still requires traversing and redrawing the elements, so there will also be a certain performance loss.
To better understand the performance difference between reflow and redraw, we will test it with the following code example. Suppose we have a page containing 1000 div elements, each div has a style with class name "box".
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: red;
margin: 10px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<!-- 1000个div -->
</div>
<script>
// 创建1000个div元素
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.classList.add('box');
document.getElementById('container').appendChild(div);
}
// 添加一个scroll事件监听器
window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {
// 修改样式属性
document.getElementById('container').style.backgroundColor = 'blue';
});
</script>
</body>
</html>In the above code, we created 1000 div elements with class "box" and added a scroll event listener. As the page scrolls, we will modify the background color of the container containing these div elements.
Let us observe the performance loss of reflow and redraw through the browser's developer tools.
First, we click on the scroll bar in the page to scroll. On each scroll event, the browser needs to perform a reflow operation to recalculate the position and layout of the elements. Through the browser's renderer tool, we can see how long the reflow operation takes.
Next, we continue to click on the scroll bar to scroll. At this time, we only perform redraw operations. Through the browser's renderer tool, we can see how long the redraw operation takes.
After testing, we can conclude that the reflow operation is more performance-intensive than the redraw operation. Because the reflow operation requires recalculating the position and layout of the element, while the redraw operation only requires redrawing the element's style.
In the actual development process, we should try to avoid frequent reflow operations because it will lead to performance degradation. An optimization method is to use the transform attribute of CSS to replace the change of style attributes, which can reduce the frequency of reflow.
To sum up, reflow and redraw are two important concepts in the browser rendering process. Reflow is more performance-intensive than redrawing because reflow requires recalculating the position and layout of elements. In actual development, we should try to reduce the frequency of reflows to improve page performance.
The above is the detailed content of Performance consumption comparison: Which one consumes more resources, reflow or redraw?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
Hot AI Tools
Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free
Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos
AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.
Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover
Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!
Hot Article
Hot Tools
Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor
SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
Performance comparison of different Java frameworks
Jun 05, 2024 pm 07:14 PM
Performance comparison of different Java frameworks: REST API request processing: Vert.x is the best, with a request rate of 2 times SpringBoot and 3 times Dropwizard. Database query: SpringBoot's HibernateORM is better than Vert.x and Dropwizard's ORM. Caching operations: Vert.x's Hazelcast client is superior to SpringBoot and Dropwizard's caching mechanisms. Suitable framework: Choose according to application requirements. Vert.x is suitable for high-performance web services, SpringBoot is suitable for data-intensive applications, and Dropwizard is suitable for microservice architecture.
Performance comparison of Java frameworks
Jun 04, 2024 pm 03:56 PM
According to benchmarks, for small, high-performance applications, Quarkus (fast startup, low memory) or Micronaut (TechEmpower excellent) are ideal choices. SpringBoot is suitable for large, full-stack applications, but has slightly slower startup times and memory usage.
How to optimize the performance of multi-threaded programs in C++?
Jun 05, 2024 pm 02:04 PM
Effective techniques for optimizing C++ multi-threaded performance include limiting the number of threads to avoid resource contention. Use lightweight mutex locks to reduce contention. Optimize the scope of the lock and minimize the waiting time. Use lock-free data structures to improve concurrency. Avoid busy waiting and notify threads of resource availability through events.
Sesame Open Door Exchange Web Page Login Latest version gateio official website entrance
Mar 04, 2025 pm 11:48 PM
A detailed introduction to the login operation of the Sesame Open Exchange web version, including login steps and password recovery process. It also provides solutions to common problems such as login failure, unable to open the page, and unable to receive verification codes to help you log in to the platform smoothly.
How to optimize the performance of H5 page production
Apr 06, 2025 am 06:24 AM
Through network requests, resource loading, JavaScript execution and rendering optimization, the performance of H5 pages can be improved and a smooth and efficient page can be created: resource optimization: compressed images (such as using tinypng), simplified code, and enabled browser caching. Network request optimization: merge files, use CDN, and load asynchronously. JavaScript optimization: reduce DOM operations, use requestAnimationFrame, and make good use of virtual DOM. Advanced skills: code segmentation, server-side rendering.
What to do if you lose your Huobi (HTX) account? A list of correct ways to retrieve Huobi (HTX) account lost
May 08, 2025 pm 07:03 PM
The following are the correct methods and precautions for recovering Huobi (HTX) account loss in 2025, integrating official processes and user practical experience to help you efficiently restore account control rights
Application of char in C language file operation
Apr 03, 2025 pm 03:12 PM
In C file operations, the char variable can be used to read a single character: through the fgetc() function. Write a single character: via the fputc() function. Read and write strings: through fgets() and fputs() functions. Perform other operations, including finding characters, locate file pointers, and judging file ends.
Why did ALCX coin plummet to US$10? Does ALCX coins have any prospects?
Mar 04, 2025 am 06:00 AM
Alchemix: The reasons for the plunge in DeFi project ALCX coin and its future prospects. Alchemix is a highly anticipated decentralized finance (DeFi) project, committed to providing users with flexible lending solutions. Its native token ALCX has experienced a surge in price and then plummeted to around $10, attracting widespread attention from the market. This article will conduct in-depth analysis of the reasons for the ALCX currency's plunge and explore its future development prospects. The reason for the ALCX coin plunge to $10: The sharp price fluctuations in ALCX coin are mainly due to the following aspects: market sentiment fluctuations: The cryptocurrency market is greatly affected by investor sentiment. Lack of mature regulatory mechanisms, the market is susceptible to panic or blind optimism, leading to large-scale selling or buying, triggering
