AI painting stirs up controversy again. Swedish artist calls artificial intelligence 'the most vicious technology'

​Artificial intelligence painting stirs up controversy again, and is called "the most vicious technology" by the artist

Swedish artist Simon Stålenhag is known for his haunting paintings that combine natural landscapes with giant robots, A weird futuristic blend of industrial machines and alien creatures. And earlier this week, Stålenhag was outraged and disgusted when he discovered that an artificial intelligence system could generate paintings that mimicked his style.

This use of artificial intelligence technology to imitate Stålenhag's paintings was completed by Andres Guadamu, a lecturer in intellectual property law at the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom, who has been working on the legal issues surrounding artificial intelligence-generated works of art. . He used an app called Midjourney to create images similar to the style of Stålenhag's paintings and posted them to his Twitter account.

Guadamuz said the images were created to highlight the legal and ethical issues that can arise from artificial intelligence algorithms that generate art. Midjourney is just one of many AI programs capable of producing artwork based on textual prompts, using machine learning algorithms learned from millions of labeled images from the internet or public datasets. After training, they can draw almost any combination of objects and scenes, and can reproduce an artist's style with astonishing accuracy.

Guadamuz said he chose to paint in the style of Stålenhag for this experiment because the artist has criticized AI-generated art in the past and is skeptical of the technology. expressed objection. He said he did not intend to upset Stålenhag or expect him to respond. But he argued in a blog post that Stålenhag's lawsuit alleging infringement is unlikely to succeed because while the artwork may be protected by copyright, the artistic style is not.

Stålenhag doesn’t think the move is funny. In a series of tweets, he said, "While borrowing from other artists is a cornerstone of creating artistic culture, artificial intelligence is not, as it only goes to show that this kind of derivative work is what tech giants want in their visions of the future. Things that were shown to us."

Guadamuz publicly apologized to Stålenhag and deleted the tweet containing the derivative image. He also said he had received some dissatisfied and angry feedback on Twitter, including death threats, from people opposed to the move.

Stålenhag said in an email that he objected to Guadamuz’s use of an AI system to imitate his style but accepted his apology. The artist doesn't consider AI images that imitate his work to be plagiarism because they look novel, and he thinks tools like this might prove useful in exploring new artistic ideas.

He claimed that "artificial intelligence is the latest and most vicious of these new technologies, collating the works created by artists throughout their lives into data, often without their consent, and using this data as It is the core component of its technology combination, and generates works that are sold to the outside world for profit.”

There are more and more artificial intelligence “painters”, and legal proceedings may be inevitable

For decades, artificial intelligence Algorithms have always been used to generate art, but a new era of artificial intelligence art began in January 2021, when artificial intelligence developer OpenAI released DALL-E, a tool that uses machine learning technology to generate simple images from text descriptions program.

And in April this year, the company released DALL-E2, which can generate photos, illustrations and paintings that look like they were made by a human artist. In July this year, OpenAI announced that DALL-E would be available for anyone to use and said the images generated could be used for commercial purposes.

OpenAI has restricted users’ use of the service, primarily using keyword filters and tools that can identify certain images that may be considered offensive. Other companies have built similar tools, such as Midjourney used by Guadamuz to emulate Stålenhag-style paintings, and their rules for appropriate use may differ.

As the use of artificial intelligence art generators begins to expand, more and more artists are beginning to question their ability to imitate the work of human creators.

RJ Palmer is good at drawing fantasy creatures and served as a concept artist in the movie "Detective Pikachu". He said that curiosity drove him to try DALL-E2, and he was worried that this artificial intelligence tool would have a negative impact on his career. Later, he was struck by how users of the open-source image generator Stable Diffusion could generate different styles of art by adding artist names to text prompts. "It is despicable that these people are using AI-generated work to imitate the artist's style and inspiration," Palmer said.

Digital artist David Oreilly, who has been critical of DALL-E, said the idea of ​​using these tools to create new works for profit is wrong. He said, "People who use AI-generated works do not own the reconstructed material, but are charged like Google Images."

Jonathan Løw, CEO of Danish photo platform Jumpstory, said he disagreed. How AI-generated images can be used commercially. He said, "I am interested in this technology, but also deeply concerned and skeptical." Hannah Wong, a spokesperson for OpenAI, said in a statement that the company's image production services are used by many artists Using the tool, the company solicited feedback from a number of artists during the development of the tool. She said, "Copyright law has adapted to new technologies in the past and will need to do the same for AI-generated content. We will continue to solicit the views and input of artists and look forward to working with them and policymakers to help protect creators rights.”

Although Guadamuz believes it will be difficult to prosecute the use of artificial intelligence technology to copy artists’ works, he expects more lawsuits to emerge in the future. “I’m sure there will be lawsuits of all kinds at some point,” he said. Like trademark infringement, copying works using artificial intelligence technology may be more legally risky.

There are also some legal experts who are not sure whether there is a legal basis for infringement of works generated by artificial intelligence. Bradford Newman, a partner at the law firm Baker McKenzie who specializes in artificial intelligence, said, "I may see some lawsuits from artists, and the reasons may include 'I did not give permission to train the algorithm on my artwork.' In this case, Who will prevail in the lawsuit will be an open question."

The above is the detailed content of AI painting stirs up controversy again. Swedish artist calls artificial intelligence 'the most vicious technology'. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!