從整體到微服務:.NET應用程序的遷移指南
遷移.NET單體應用到微服務應避免一次性重寫,1. 首先明確遷移動機並規避常見陷阱,確保團隊具備DevOps與可觀測性能力;2. 採用絞殺者模式逐步替換,通過API網關路由新功能至新服務;3. 運用領域驅動設計識別限界上下文,按業務邊界拆分服務並隔離數據庫;4. 選擇合適的通信方式,對用戶請求用HTTP/REST,對事件用異步消息如Azure Service Bus;5. 通過事件最終一致性、Saga模式和Outbox模式保障跨服務數據一致性;6. 早期集成Serilog、OpenTelemetry等工具構建日誌、追踪與指標監控體系;7. 為每個服務建立獨立的CI/CD流水線,使用Docker容器化並部署至Kubernetes等平台。該過程是漸進式演進而非一次性項目,需以小步驗證、持續保障系統穩定運行結束。
Migrating a .NET monolith to microservices isn't about rewriting everything at once—it's about breaking down a complex system into manageable, independent services while maintaining business continuity. Done right, this shift improves scalability, team autonomy, and deployment velocity. But getting there requires strategy, patience, and a few key patterns.
Here's how to approach the migration in a practical, low-risk way.
1. Start with the Right Motivation (and Avoid Common Pitfalls)
Before writing a single line of code, ask: Why are we moving to microservices?
Common valid reasons:
- Teams are stepping on each other's code.
- Deployment cycles are too long.
- Certain parts of the app need to scale independently.
- You're introducing new tech stacks or deployment models.
Red flags:
- “Because everyone else is doing it.”
- No DevOps or CI/CD pipeline in place.
- Lack of monitoring or observability.
Microservices add operational complexity. If your team isn't ready to manage distributed systems, you'll trade one set of problems for a harder one.
2. Use the Strangler Pattern to Incrementally Replace the Monolith
The Strangler Pattern lets you gradually replace parts of your monolith without a risky “big bang” rewrite.
How it works:
- Keep the existing monolith running.
- Route new functionality (or high-impact modules) into new microservices.
- Use API gateways or reverse proxies to route requests: old paths go to the monolith, new ones go to microservices.
- Over time, more functionality is “strangled” out of the monolith.
Example in .NET: Suppose your monolith has a tightly coupled Order and Inventory module. You can:
- Extract Inventory into a standalone service using ASP.NET Core Web API.
- Deploy it as a separate app (eg, on Kubernetes or Azure App Service).
- Update the monolith to call the new Inventory API instead of using in-process logic.
- Eventually, deprecate the old inventory code.
Tools like Ocelot or YARP (Yet Another Reverse Proxy) can help route traffic during transition.
3. Identify Bounded Contexts Using Domain-Driven Design (DDD)
Not every class or folder should become a service. Use DDD to find natural boundaries.
Ask:
- Which parts of the system change together?
- What data is tightly coupled?
- Who owns this feature (team boundaries)?
For example, in an e-commerce app:
- Orders → Order Service
- Payments → Payment Service
- Users → Identity Service
- Product Catalog → Catalog Service
Each service should own its data. Avoid shared databases. In .NET, this means:
- Each service has its own DbContext.
- Use Entity Framework Core with isolated databases.
- Prefer asynchronous communication (eg, via messaging) over direct DB access.
4. Choose the Right Communication Style
In a monolith, method calls are in-process and fast. In microservices, you must handle network calls.
Options in .NET:
- HTTP/REST – Simple, widely supported. Use
HttpClient
or Refit. - gRPC – Faster, contract-first, great for internal services. Built into .NET 5 .
- Messaging (eg, RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus) – Enables async, decoupled communication.
Best practice:
- Use synchronous (HTTP) for request/response with user-facing APIs.
- Use async messaging for background tasks or inter-service events (eg, “OrderCreated” → trigger inventory deduction).
Example with Azure Service Bus in .NET:
// Publishing an event await sender.SendMessageAsync(new ServiceBusMessage(JsonSerializer.Serialize(order)));
Use libraries like MassTransit or NServiceBus to simplify messaging patterns.
5. Handle Data Consistency Across Services
One of the biggest challenges: you can't use distributed transactions easily.
Solutions:
- Eventual consistency – Accept that data may be temporarily out of sync.
- Saga pattern – Break long operations into steps with compensating actions.
- Outbox pattern – Store events in the same DB transaction, then publish them reliably.
In .NET, you can implement the outbox using:
- A table to store outgoing events.
- A background service (
IHostedService
) that polls and publishes.
This avoids dual writes and ensures reliability.
6. Build Observability Early
With distributed systems, debugging becomes harder.
Essential tools for .NET:
- Logging – Use Serilog with structured logging.
- Tracing – Enable OpenTelemetry in ASP.NET Core to track requests across services.
- Metrics – Expose Prometheus endpoints with
OpenTelemetry.Exporter.Prometheus
. - Health checks – Use
MapHealthChecks()
in Program.cs.
Example:
builder.Services.AddOpenTelemetryTracing(tracing => { tracing.AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation() .AddHttpClientInstrumentation() .AddOtlpExporter(); // Send to Jaeger or Grafana Tempo });
Set this up from day one. You'll thank yourself later.
7. Automate Deployment and CI/CD
Each microservice should be independently deployable.
In .NET, this means:
One Git repo per service (or use a monorepo with careful pipelines).
Separate CI/CD pipelines (Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions).
Containerize with Docker:
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0 AS base WORKDIR /app EXPOSE 8080 FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:8.0 AS build WORKDIR /src COPY . . RUN dotnet publish -c Release -o /app/out FROM base AS final WORKDIR /app COPY --from=build /app/out . ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "OrderService.dll"]
Deploy to Kubernetes, Azure Container Apps, or similar.
Final Thoughts
Migrating from a .NET monolith to microservices is a journey, not a project. Start small: pick one well-bounded module, extract it safely using the Strangler Pattern, and validate the operational overhead.
Focus on team autonomy, independent deployability, and resilience—not just technology.
Use the .NET ecosystem wisely: leverage ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, OpenTelemetry, and modern cloud platforms to reduce friction.
It's not about replacing the monolith overnight. It's about making the system easier to evolve—one service at a time.
Basically, take small steps, measure impact, and keep the lights on.
以上是從整體到微服務:.NET應用程序的遷移指南的詳細內容。更多資訊請關注PHP中文網其他相關文章!

熱AI工具

Undress AI Tool
免費脫衣圖片

Undresser.AI Undress
人工智慧驅動的應用程序,用於創建逼真的裸體照片

AI Clothes Remover
用於從照片中去除衣服的線上人工智慧工具。

Stock Market GPT
人工智慧支援投資研究,做出更明智的決策

熱門文章

熱工具

記事本++7.3.1
好用且免費的程式碼編輯器

SublimeText3漢化版
中文版,非常好用

禪工作室 13.0.1
強大的PHP整合開發環境

Dreamweaver CS6
視覺化網頁開發工具

SublimeText3 Mac版
神級程式碼編輯軟體(SublimeText3)

答案是使用Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration讀取appsettings.json。 1.創建appsettings.json並設置複製屬性;2.安裝Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json包;3.用ConfigurationBuilder加載配置;4.通過索引器或GetConnectionString讀取值;5.推薦使用強類型配置類Bind或Get綁定。

usestringforminimal,pattictextepterations; usestringbuilderforfrefrequentmodificationsinloopsorlarge-scaleconconcatenation stoImpReverPerformancanceanDrefformanceanDreduceMemoryallocation。

HttpClient應長期復用而非頻繁創建,推薦通過IHttpClientFactory注入管理,避免socket耗盡;若無DI則用靜態實例,確保生命週期合理。

遷移.NET單體應用到微服務應避免一次性重寫,1.首先明確遷移動機並規避常見陷阱,確保團隊具備DevOps與可觀測性能力;2.採用絞殺者模式逐步替換,通過API網關路由新功能至新服務;3.運用領域驅動設計識別限界上下文,按業務邊界拆分服務並隔離數據庫;4.選擇合適的通信方式,對用戶請求用HTTP/REST,對事件用異步消息如AzureServiceBus;5.通過事件最終一致性、Saga模式和Outbox模式保障跨服務數據一致性;6.早期集成Serilog、OpenTelemetry等工具構建日

public成員可被任意代碼訪問;2.private僅限類內訪問;3.protected允許類及派生類訪問;4.internal限同一程序集內訪問;5.protectedinternal為protected與internal的並集,用於派生類或同程序集訪問。

first()throwsAnexceptionifnoElementIffound,wherfirstordefault()returnSadeFaultValue; usefirst()whenthesequenceisexpectedTobenon-empty,andfirstordEfault()tohandleStordEft()

創建CancellationTokenSource獲取CancellationToken,用於通知其他線程或組件取消操作。 2.將令牌傳遞給支持取消的異步方法(如Task.Run),任務可週期性檢查取消請求,實現優雅終止。

PatternmatchinginC#isafeatureusedtocheckobjectsagainstpatternsandextractinformationconcisely.1.Typepatternsallowcheckingandcastinginonestep,asshownwithif(valueisstringstr).2.Constantpatternscomparevaluesagainstconstantsdirectly,suchascheckingif(input
