Java Concurrent Programming Series Extra ChapterC A S (Compare and swap)
, the article style is still full of pictures and texts, easy to understand , allowing readers to have a crazy confrontation with the interviewer.
C A S
is an indispensable basic knowledge of concurrent programming.C A S
is also a frequent test site during interviews, soC A S
is a must-know. Definitely, this article will give readers an in-depth understanding ofC A S
.
C A S(compareAndSwap)Also called comparison exchange, it is a lock-free atomic algorithm. It is mapped to the operating system as a
cmpxchghardware assembly instruction (
guaranteed atomicity). Its function is to makeC P UUpdate the memory value to the new value, but there is a condition. The memory value must be the same as the expected value, and the
C A Soperation does not require switching between user mode and kernel mode. Read and write memory directly in user mode (
means no blocking/thread context switching).
It contains3
parametersC A S (V, E, N)
,V
represents the memory value to be updated,E
represents Expected value,N
represents the new value. When theV
value is equal to theE
value, theV
value will be updated toN
value, if theV
value is different from theE
value, no update is performed. This is aC A S
operation.
Simply put,C A S
requires you to give an additional expected value, that is, what you think this variable should look like now, if the variable is not you As you can imagine, it means that it has been modified by someone else. You only need to re-read it, set a new expected value, and try to modify it again.
Atomicity refers to the characteristic that one or more operations are not interrupted during the execution ofC P U
, either execution, Otherwise, it cannot be executed halfway (One or a series of operations that cannot be interrupted).
In order to ensure the atomicity ofC A S
,C P U
provides the following two methods
The bus (B U S
) is the method of transmitting data between computer components, which meansC P U
Connecting and transmitting data with other components is accomplished by the bus, such asC P U
reading and writing memory.
Bus lockmeans thatC P U
uses a bus lock. The so-called bus lock is the ## provided byC P U
#LOCK# signal, when
C P Uoutputs the
LOCK# signal on the bus, other
C P U's bus requests will be blocked.
C P Uis designed with the idea of narrowing the locking range. Cache line locking (
A cache line is the smallest unit ofC P Ucache storage
).
The so-calledcache lockrefers toC P U
locking thecache line. When the shared variables in the cache line are written back to the memory, otherC P U
will sense whether the shared variable has changed through the bus sniffing mechanism. If it changes, it will invalidate its corresponding shared variable cache line and read the latest data from the memory again. Cache locking is based on the cache consistency mechanism. Implemented, because the cache consistency mechanism will prevent more than twoC P U
from modifying the same shared variable at the same time (ModernC P U
basically supports and uses the cache locking mechanism) .
C A S
and locks both solve the atomicity problem. Compared with locks, there is no blocking, thread context switching, or death. Lock, soC A S
has better performance than lock, butC A S
also has shortcomings.
C A S
’s questions are as follows
ABA
Question
C A S
can only target one Shared variables are used. If there are multiple shared variables, you can only use locks. Of course, if you have a way to integrate multiple variables into one variable, it is also good to useC A S
, such asstate in read-write locks. The high and low bits of
.
When a thread acquires a lock If it fails, it will not block and suspend, but try to obtain again after a period of time until it succeeds. This cyclic acquisition mechanism is called spin lock (spinlock
).
The advantage of spin lock is that the thread holding the lock releases the lock in a short time, and those threads waiting for the lock competition do not need to enter the blocking state (No need for thread context switching/No need for user mode and kernel State switching), they only need to wait (spin), and can obtain it after the thread holding the lock releases the lock, thus avoiding the consumption of switching between user mode and kernel mode.
The disadvantages of spin locks are obvious. Threads hold locks for a long time, and threads waiting for competing locks keep spinning, that is, the CPU keeps idling, and resources are wasted in meaningless places, so spin is generally restricted. frequency.
Finally, let’s talk about the implementation of spin lock. The implementation of spin lock can be based onC A S
. First define thelockValue
object default value1
,1
means the lock resource is free,0
means the lock resource is occupied, the code is as follows
public class SpinLock { //lockValue 默认值1 private AtomicInteger lockValue = new AtomicInteger(1); //自旋获取锁 public void lock(){ // 循环检测尝试获取锁 while (!tryLock()){ // 空转 } } //获取锁 public boolean tryLock(){ // 期望值1,更新值0,更新成功返回true,更新失败返回false return lockValue.compareAndSet(1,0); } //释放锁 public void unLock(){ if(!lockValue.compareAndSet(1,0)){ throw new RuntimeException("释放锁失败"); } } }
ThelockValue
variable of typeAtomicInteger
is defined above.AtomicInteger
is implemented byJava
based onC A S
Integer
Atomic operation class also defines 3 functionslock, tryLock, unLock
tryLock function-get lock
Update
value, the
lockValuevalue is updated to
0and
true# is returned ##, otherwise execute the following logic
false# will be returned
0
, updated value1
Update
value, the
lockValuevalue is updated to
1, return
true, otherwise execute the following logic
value , does not make any updates, returns
false
tryLock
function and returntrue
to stop, otherwise it will keep looping
tryLocksuccessful thread (
updateslockValueto
0), the code block will be executed. Other threadstryLock
spin and wait for
lockValueto be updated to
1,
tryLocksuccessful thread Execute
unLock(
updatelockValueto
1), and the spinning thread willtryLock
successfully.
C A S
Needs Check Whether the memory value to be updated has been modified, if not, it will be updated. However, there is a situation where if a value was originallyA
, it becameB
, and then became # again. ##A, when
C A Sis checked, it will be found that it has not been modified.
Assume there are two threads, thread1
reads the memory valueA
, thread1
uses up the time slice, switches to thread2
, thread2
also read the memory valueA
, modified it to theB
value, and then restored theB
value to # The ##Avalue, simply put, the modification sequence is
A->B->A, and then thread
1resumes running, and it finds that the memory value is still
A, and then perform the
C A Soperation. This is the famous
ABAproblem, but it seems that there is no problem.
It’s just a simple data structure, so there really won’t be any problems. If it’s a complex data structure, there may be problems (UsingAtomicReference
can useC A S
On the object), taking the linked list data structure as an example, two threads delete the head node throughC A S
, assuming that the linked list now hasA->B
nodes
1
Delete
A
node,
B
node becomes the head node and is about to be executed# When ##C A S(A,A,B)
, the time slice is used up, switch to thread
2
Delete
A and B
nodes
and add
C and A
nodes, and the linked list node becomes
A- >C
Reacquire the time slice and execute
C A S(A,A,B)
Node
It is also very simple to solve theA B A
problem. Just add the version number, and add1
every time it changes, that is,A —> B — > A
, becomes1A —> 2B —> 3A
,AtomicStampedRdference
is provided inJava
to implement this solution (As long as you askC A S
in the interview, you will definitely askABA
, you must understand this).
The above is the detailed content of Novices can also compete with BAT interviewers: CAS. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!