80% of Nature readers are using ChatGPT, and the most popular scientific research direction is brainstorming!

ChatGPT has been controversial in academia.

Should I use ChatGPT to write papers and create works?

Some universities and publishing houses have made it clear that they prohibit it, but some people also support the use of ChatGPT.

According to Amazon statistics, as of mid-February, there were more than 200 e-books in the Kindle store with ChatGPT listed as the author.

There are concerns that without greater transparency, the technology could flood the market with low-quality books, putting many writers out of work.

Brainstorming with ChatGPT

Recently, Nature conducted a survey among its readers to study their frequency of use of generative AI tools.

Research shows that researchers are keen to try out generative AI tools, such as the advanced chatbot ChatGPT, to help them get their jobs done.

At the same time, they are also worried about potential errors and false information that AI may have.

How to explain specifically?

Nature surveyed 627 readers through an online questionnaire.

The results show that about 80% of people have used ChatGPT or similar AI tools at least once.

Among them, more than 1/5 people use such tools frequently: 8% use them every day, and 14% use them several times a week.

Also approximately 38% of respondents knew of other researchers using these tools for research or teaching.

So what are these readers doing using AI tools such as ChatGPT?

A considerable number of respondents (57%) said that they use ChatGPT or generative AI tools only for creative fun and have nothing to do with their own research.

Among science-related applications, 27% of respondents said they use it to brainstorm research ideas.

Nearly 24% said they use generative AI tools to write code; about 16% said they use these tools to help write research manuscripts, create presentations or write literature Review.

Only 10% use them to help write grant applications, and 10% use these apps to generate images.

In the questionnaire, participants shared their views on the potential of generative AI and their views on it through open-ended questions and answers. concerns about its use.

Some say these tools will help with boring, tedious or repetitive tasks, such as crunching numbers or analyzing large data sets, writing and debugging code, literature searches, and being able to generate insights into research. beneficial significant impact.

Jessica Niewint-Gori, a researcher at INDIRE, the Italian Ministry of Education’s Institute for Educational Research and Innovation, said this is a good basic tool so you can focus on higher-level thinking. Or customize AI-created content.

Some hope that artificial intelligence can speed up and simplify the writing task by providing a quick initial framework that can be edited into a more detailed final version.

Dhiliphan Madhav, a biologist at the Central Leather Research Institute in Chennai, India, said,

Generative language models are very useful for people like me who don’t have English as their first language. It allows me to write smoother and faster than ever before. It was like having a professional language editor by my side while writing my paper.

However, there are concerns about the reliability of these tools and the potential for misuse.

There are many people who worry that the results provided by AI may contain errors or biases.

Sanas Mir-Bashiri, a molecular biologist at the University of Munich in Germany, said that ChatGPT once created a completely fictitious document list for me. None of these publications actually exist, which I think is very misleading.

There are also concerns that these tools could be used to cheat or produce plausible scientific disinformation.

It is often mentioned that artificial intelligence can be used by "paper mills" to produce fake scientific publications, and that over-reliance on AI for writing tasks may hinder researchers' creativity and hinder learning process.

Many people agree that the key to the question is whether you view AI as a tool that helps get work done, rather than completely replacing it.

ChatGPT is on duty to write articles

Similarly, recently, a well-known science fiction magazine "Clark World" closed its submission window.

The reason is not difficult to guess, there are too many AI submissions.

"Clark World" was founded in 2006. It has published the works of many famous science fiction writers and has won many awards. Hugo Award.

##According to statistics, since the release of ChatGPT, 500 spam emails have flooded in in February this year.

There were only 100 articles in January, and there were 25 articles in October last year. It can be seen that the surge in the number of submissions is roughly the same as the release of ChatGPT.

The magazine speculates that many people just want to use AI to make quick money.

In his blog, he cited a typical example.

The original text is from an article titled "Human Error" published by Raymond F. Jones in 1956.

By comparison, the following paragraph of text generated by AI basically replaces the words of the original text.

Currently, for magazines, there is no hard and fast solution to this problem.

While "Clark World" closed its submission window, Amazon announced that more than 200 kindle e-books listed ChatGPT as the author.

Brett Schickler never thought he would become a published author. After learning about ChatGPT, Schickler’s idea of ​​writing a book became possible.

By using AI that can generate text based on simple prompts, Schickler created a 30-page illustrated children's e-book in a few hours.

It can be seen that ChatGPT seems ready to subvert the traditional book industry.

Some would-be novelists hoping to make quick money are trying to use tools similar to ChatGPT to write books and publish them on the Amazon platform.

It is worth mentioning that illustrated children’s books are the favorites of first-time creative authors.

Hundreds of tutorials are popping up on YouTube, TikTok and Reddit demonstrating how to create a book in just a few hours, including get-rich-quick schemes, diet advice, software Coding tips and recipes.

What is worrying is that the influx of these books written by ChatGPT into the market will leave many authors facing unemployment problems .

Automation through artificial intelligence can turn book writing from a craft into a commodity, according to the executive director of the Writers Guild. Authors and platforms need to be transparent about how these books are created, otherwise a flood of low-quality books will be produced.

Some people say that we need to protect ourselves in a "bubble" because almost everything we encounter outside this bubble is a lie.

The above is the detailed content of 80% of Nature readers are using ChatGPT, and the most popular scientific research direction is brainstorming!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!