Hollywood screenwriters are on strike collectively, opposing the use of AI to write scripts instead of humans. Please do not participate in ChatGPT

ChatGPT may have never dreamed that one day it would become the reason for human strikes.

It has not yet been decided whether jobs will be replaced by AI, so Hollywood screenwriters took the lead and went on strike.

The reason for their strike is not entirely because they are worried about losing their jobs, but mainly because they feel insulted by AI creation.

Previously, this group of screenwriters had been negotiating with major entertainment companies including Netflix and Disney for 6 weeks.

But the result is obvious-the talks collapsed.

(Film and TV companies) The idea of ​​replacing writers with artificial intelligence is the most worrying - it shows that these companies do not value writers and their work.

Screenwriter: AI does little harm, but is extremely insulting!

One of the ideas of film and television companies is to let AI generate drafts of film and television works, and then polish them manually.

In the eyes of Hollywood screenwriters, this is not only using AI to create works, but also letting humans work for AI.

Obviously, this idea offended the writers, who directly stated that there was no way.

They require film and television companies not to hand over raw materials generated by artificial intelligence to humans for modification.

As expected, the film and television company rejected this request and only symbolically stated that "technological progress will be discussed at the annual meeting."

In this regard, John August, the screenwriter of "Charlie and His Chocolate Factory" sharply pointed out that the so-called "discussion at the annual meeting" is simply nonsense.

Artificial intelligence-generated materials aren’t just a few years away—they’re already flooding our world.

Robert Cargill, the screenwriter of "Doctor Strange", said on social media that the scary thing is not that jobs will be replaced by AI, but that screenwriters will be reduced to rewriting the "garbage" generated by AI at extremely low salaries. fields, whereas artificial creation could have been done better.

In addition to refusing to provide revisions to the AI ​​draft, the screenwriters also requested that AI-generated content not be included in film and television works, but they were also rejected.

In the view of the screenwriters, even if this AI generation-manual modification mode is not used, the use of AI in creation is unacceptable.

This is Cargill again. He believes that AI only knows Ctrl C and Ctrl V, and their "works" are worthless.

A Marvel screenwriter Quinton Peeples also believes that the use of AI-generated film and television works is an insult to humanity.

Screenwriters are always valued for their ability to express uniquely human experiences. So if you say now that machines can do a better job, that's not only ridiculous, it's also deeply insulting.

Previously, Netflix had caused public outrage for using AI to generate content in its animation "Dog and Boy".

After the release of Netflix’s animation, Hayao Miyazaki, who is over 80 years old, stood up against AIGC’s work and said unceremoniously that it was an insult to life.

Inescapable Copyright Issue

Another demand of the screenwriters is that human works must not be used to train AI.

But in fact, AI has used a large number of human works in the training process.

Most of these works are protected by copyright, and the copyright-holding creators have never authorized AI to use their works.

Obviously, they know that once they hand over the rights to their works, they will not be able to predict how their hard work will be used.

Creators certainly don’t want their works to be ravaged beyond recognition by AI.

This requirement has also resonated with many screenwriters outside Hollywood and even creators in other literary fields.

Hari Kunzru, the Maugham Literary Award writer, said that creators of other literary genres should also pay attention to the negotiations launched by Hollywood screenwriters.

Kunzru said that unless he has control over the model, he will not authorize his work for LLM training.

Netizen: The screenwriters are worrying too much

As for the writers’ worries, some netizens believe that it is reasonable: Although AI cannot completely replace the work of screenwriters, this does not hinder AI Applications are deployed on a large scale.

After all, it’s about reducing costs and increasing efficiency.

But some people think that the writers have gone too far:

Chatbots may replace bad writers, but they cannot replace good writers.

Some netizens even complained about these screenwriters, saying that since they are on strike, AI can immediately take over their jobs.

#And in the corner of the debate scene, there are still some melon-eaters who have moved small benches and are waiting to see AI's "new stuff"...

So, what do you think about this?

Reference link:
[1]. https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkap3m/gpt-4-cant-replace-striking-tv-writers-but-studios- are-going-to-try
[2]. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/netflixs-dog-and-boy-anime-short-causes-outrage-for-incorporating-ai-generated- backgrounds-203035524.html
[3].https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/136m6es/gpt4_cant_replace_striking_tv_writers_but_studios/
[4]. https://www.reddit.com/r /ArtificialInteligence/comments/1364bdb/hollywood_writers_are_on_strike_one_of_their/

The above is the detailed content of Hollywood screenwriters are on strike collectively, opposing the use of AI to write scripts instead of humans. Please do not participate in ChatGPT. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!