Piping Multiple Processes in Python using Subprocess.Popen
When trying to connect multiple processes via pipes using subprocess.Popen, the task can be simplified by delegating pipe creation to the shell. Consider the following Python code:
awk_sort = subprocess.Popen("awk -f script.awk | sort > outfile.txt", stdin=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True) awk_sort.communicate(b"input data\n")
In this example, the shell is responsible for connecting the awk and sort processes with a pipeline. This eliminates the need to manage multiple subprocesses and pipes directly.
Eliminating the Need for External Tools
However, as some experts suggest, it's often advantageous to avoid using external tools like awk. Rewriting the script in Python can enhance performance and eliminate the complexity inherent in pipelining. For example:
import subprocess p = subprocess.Popen("sort", stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=open("outfile.txt", "w")) p.communicate(b"input data\n")
This Python-native script achieves the same functionality without the need for pipelining or external commands. By simplifying the code, the potential for errors and ambiguities is reduced.
Reasons for Avoiding Pipelining
While pipelining can offer performance benefits in certain scenarios, it often adds unnecessary complexity to the code. Here are some reasons to consider avoiding pipelining:
Conclusion
Delegating pipelining to the shell can simplify code by allowing the shell to handle the pipe creation process. However, it's important to carefully consider whether external tools and pipelining are necessary for the task at hand. In many cases, eliminating pipelining and external tools can enhance code simplicity and performance.
The above is the detailed content of Should I Use Shell Pipelining or Native Python for Multi-Process Operations?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!