Const std::map Access: `operator[]` or `at()`?

Accessing Const Maps: Operator[] vs. at()

When working with const std::maps, accessing elements through the operator[] may fail. This is because operator[] requires non-const access to potentially modify the map, which is incompatible with a const reference.

Instead, the at() method provides a safer alternative for accessing elements in const maps. Unlike operator[], at() throws a std::out_of_range exception if the key does not exist, rather than inserting a default constructed element. This allows for more predictable and safer access in const contexts.

In C 11, at() was introduced as a new method for std::map. It behaves similarly to the at() method in deque and vector, raising an exception if the key does not exist. This standardized behavior for accessing elements in bounded containers eliminates the need for a const overload of operator[].

Therefore, when accessing elements in a const std::map, it is recommended to use the at() method to ensure both safety and consistency with the behavior of other bounded containers. References to the at() method and further details can be found in the C 11 documentation.

The above is the detailed content of Const std::map Access: `operator[]` or `at()`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!