从整体到微服务:.NET应用程序的迁移指南
迁移.NET单体应用到微服务应避免一次性重写,1. 首先明确迁移动机并规避常见陷阱,确保团队具备DevOps与可观测性能力;2. 采用绞杀者模式逐步替换,通过API网关路由新功能至新服务;3. 运用领域驱动设计识别限界上下文,按业务边界拆分服务并隔离数据库;4. 选择合适的通信方式,对用户请求用HTTP/REST,对事件用异步消息如Azure Service Bus;5. 通过事件最终一致性、Saga模式和Outbox模式保障跨服务数据一致性;6. 早期集成Serilog、OpenTelemetry等工具构建日志、追踪与指标监控体系;7. 为每个服务建立独立的CI/CD流水线,使用Docker容器化并部署至Kubernetes等平台。该过程是渐进式演进而非一次性项目,需以小步验证、持续保障系统稳定运行结束。
Migrating a .NET monolith to microservices isn’t about rewriting everything at once—it’s about breaking down a complex system into manageable, independent services while maintaining business continuity. Done right, this shift improves scalability, team autonomy, and deployment velocity. But getting there requires strategy, patience, and a few key patterns.
Here’s how to approach the migration in a practical, low-risk way.
1. Start with the Right Motivation (and Avoid Common Pitfalls)
Before writing a single line of code, ask: Why are we moving to microservices?
Common valid reasons:
- Teams are stepping on each other’s code.
- Deployment cycles are too long.
- Certain parts of the app need to scale independently.
- You’re introducing new tech stacks or deployment models.
Red flags:
- “Because everyone else is doing it.”
- No DevOps or CI/CD pipeline in place.
- Lack of monitoring or observability.
Microservices add operational complexity. If your team isn’t ready to manage distributed systems, you’ll trade one set of problems for a harder one.
2. Use the Strangler Pattern to Incrementally Replace the Monolith
The Strangler Pattern lets you gradually replace parts of your monolith without a risky “big bang” rewrite.
How it works:
- Keep the existing monolith running.
- Route new functionality (or high-impact modules) into new microservices.
- Use API gateways or reverse proxies to route requests: old paths go to the monolith, new ones go to microservices.
- Over time, more functionality is “strangled” out of the monolith.
Example in .NET: Suppose your monolith has a tightly coupled Order and Inventory module. You can:
- Extract Inventory into a standalone service using ASP.NET Core Web API.
- Deploy it as a separate app (e.g., on Kubernetes or Azure App Service).
- Update the monolith to call the new Inventory API instead of using in-process logic.
- Eventually, deprecate the old inventory code.
Tools like Ocelot or YARP (Yet Another Reverse Proxy) can help route traffic during transition.
3. Identify Bounded Contexts Using Domain-Driven Design (DDD)
Not every class or folder should become a service. Use DDD to find natural boundaries.
Ask:
- Which parts of the system change together?
- What data is tightly coupled?
- Who owns this feature (team boundaries)?
For example, in an e-commerce app:
- Orders → Order Service
- Payments → Payment Service
- Users → Identity Service
- Product Catalog → Catalog Service
Each service should own its data. Avoid shared databases. In .NET, this means:
- Each service has its own DbContext.
- Use Entity Framework Core with isolated databases.
- Prefer asynchronous communication (e.g., via messaging) over direct DB access.
4. Choose the Right Communication Style
In a monolith, method calls are in-process and fast. In microservices, you must handle network calls.
Options in .NET:
-
HTTP/REST – Simple, widely supported. Use
HttpClient
or Refit. - gRPC – Faster, contract-first, great for internal services. Built into .NET 5 .
- Messaging (e.g., RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus) – Enables async, decoupled communication.
Best practice:
- Use synchronous (HTTP) for request/response with user-facing APIs.
- Use async messaging for background tasks or inter-service events (e.g., “OrderCreated” → trigger inventory deduction).
Example with Azure Service Bus in .NET:
// Publishing an event await sender.SendMessageAsync(new ServiceBusMessage(JsonSerializer.Serialize(order)));
Use libraries like MassTransit or NServiceBus to simplify messaging patterns.
5. Handle Data Consistency Across Services
One of the biggest challenges: you can’t use distributed transactions easily.
Solutions:
- Eventual consistency – Accept that data may be temporarily out of sync.
- Saga pattern – Break long operations into steps with compensating actions.
- Outbox pattern – Store events in the same DB transaction, then publish them reliably.
In .NET, you can implement the outbox using:
- A table to store outgoing events.
- A background service (
IHostedService
) that polls and publishes.
This avoids dual writes and ensures reliability.
6. Build Observability Early
With distributed systems, debugging becomes harder.
Essential tools for .NET:
- Logging – Use Serilog with structured logging.
- Tracing – Enable OpenTelemetry in ASP.NET Core to track requests across services.
- Metrics – Expose Prometheus endpoints with
OpenTelemetry.Exporter.Prometheus
. - Health checks – Use
MapHealthChecks()
in Program.cs.
Example:
builder.Services.AddOpenTelemetryTracing(tracing => { tracing.AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation() .AddHttpClientInstrumentation() .AddOtlpExporter(); // Send to Jaeger or Grafana Tempo });
Set this up from day one. You’ll thank yourself later.
7. Automate Deployment and CI/CD
Each microservice should be independently deployable.
In .NET, this means:
One Git repo per service (or use a monorepo with careful pipelines).
Separate CI/CD pipelines (Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions).
Containerize with Docker:
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0 AS base WORKDIR /app EXPOSE 8080 FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:8.0 AS build WORKDIR /src COPY . . RUN dotnet publish -c Release -o /app/out FROM base AS final WORKDIR /app COPY --from=build /app/out . ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "OrderService.dll"]
Deploy to Kubernetes, Azure Container Apps, or similar.
Final Thoughts
Migrating from a .NET monolith to microservices is a journey, not a project. Start small: pick one well-bounded module, extract it safely using the Strangler Pattern, and validate the operational overhead.
Focus on team autonomy, independent deployability, and resilience—not just technology.
Use the .NET ecosystem wisely: leverage ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, OpenTelemetry, and modern cloud platforms to reduce friction.
It’s not about replacing the monolith overnight. It’s about making the system easier to evolve—one service at a time.
Basically, take small steps, measure impact, and keep the lights on.
以上是从整体到微服务:.NET应用程序的迁移指南的详细内容。更多信息请关注PHP中文网其他相关文章!

热AI工具

Undress AI Tool
免费脱衣服图片

Undresser.AI Undress
人工智能驱动的应用程序,用于创建逼真的裸体照片

AI Clothes Remover
用于从照片中去除衣服的在线人工智能工具。

Stock Market GPT
人工智能驱动投资研究,做出更明智的决策

热门文章

热工具

记事本++7.3.1
好用且免费的代码编辑器

SublimeText3汉化版
中文版,非常好用

禅工作室 13.0.1
功能强大的PHP集成开发环境

Dreamweaver CS6
视觉化网页开发工具

SublimeText3 Mac版
神级代码编辑软件(SublimeText3)

答案是使用Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration读取appsettings.json。1.创建appsettings.json并设置复制属性;2.安装Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json包;3.用ConfigurationBuilder加载配置;4.通过索引器或GetConnectionString读取值;5.推荐使用强类型配置类Bind或Get绑定。

usestringforminimal,pattictextepterations; usestringbuilderforfrefrequentmodificationsinloopsorlarge-scaleconconcatenation stoImpReverPerformancanceanDrefformanceanDreduceMemoryallocation。

HttpClient应长期复用而非频繁创建,推荐通过IHttpClientFactory注入管理,避免socket耗尽;若无DI则用静态实例,确保生命周期合理。

迁移.NET单体应用到微服务应避免一次性重写,1.首先明确迁移动机并规避常见陷阱,确保团队具备DevOps与可观测性能力;2.采用绞杀者模式逐步替换,通过API网关路由新功能至新服务;3.运用领域驱动设计识别限界上下文,按业务边界拆分服务并隔离数据库;4.选择合适的通信方式,对用户请求用HTTP/REST,对事件用异步消息如AzureServiceBus;5.通过事件最终一致性、Saga模式和Outbox模式保障跨服务数据一致性;6.早期集成Serilog、OpenTelemetry等工具构建日

first()throwsAnexceptionifnoElementIffound,wherfirstordefault()returnSadeFaultValue; usefirst()whenthesequenceisexpectedTobenon-empty,andfirstordEfault()tohandleStordEft()

public成员可被任意代码访问;2.private仅限类内访问;3.protected允许类及派生类访问;4.internal限同一程序集内访问;5.protectedinternal为protected与internal的并集,用于派生类或同程序集访问。

创建CancellationTokenSource获取CancellationToken,用于通知其他线程或组件取消操作。2.将令牌传递给支持取消的异步方法(如Task.Run),任务可周期性检查取消请求,实现优雅终止。

PatternmatchinginC#isafeatureusedtocheckobjectsagainstpatternsandextractinformationconcisely.1.Typepatternsallowcheckingandcastinginonestep,asshownwithif(valueisstringstr).2.Constantpatternscomparevaluesagainstconstantsdirectly,suchascheckingif(input
