I think the principle is whichever one is easier to use
I am also a novice, so I will just talk about my personal understanding. I welcome guidance from experts
h is more heavyweight and complex than m. It is easy to get started but difficult to master, and it is difficult to master. When I first started learning, I thought it would be better not to even write SQL. Later I found out that the disadvantage of this is that it cannot be performance tuned. If you let h execute SQL, it can be done, but it goes against his original intention. Moreover, it is not very comfortable for a table to correspond to a large amount of XML. m is a little lighter, you can directly write SQL (template), it is easy to get started, it is decoupled, and it feels very cool. From my shallow perspective, it seems that m is more popular than h now. Finallyyou will know after using it
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
I think the principle is whichever one is easier to use
h is more heavyweight and complex than m. It is easy to get started but difficult to master, and it is difficult to master. When I first started learning, I thought it would be better not to even write SQL. Later I found out that the disadvantage of this is that it cannot be performance tuned. If you let h execute SQL, it can be done, but it goes against his original intention. Moreover, it is not very comfortable for a table to correspond to a large amount of XML.
m is a little lighter, you can directly write SQL (template), it is easy to get started, it is decoupled, and it feels very cool.
From my shallow perspective, it seems that m is more popular than h now.
Finallyyou will know after using it