84669 person learning
152542 person learning
20005 person learning
5487 person learning
7821 person learning
359900 person learning
3350 person learning
180660 person learning
48569 person learning
18603 person learning
40936 person learning
1549 person learning
1183 person learning
32909 person learning
ringa_lee
如果你的count等于xxx.size(),没啥大区别,也不会不安全。但问题是你干嘛要这样做呢?要么就只用xxx.at(i)来访问不用iterator;要么纯用iterator来访问
直接用it != xxx.end()来控制不是更好,不必再定义新的变量count来操作
要不就范围for循环或者迭代器?
如果你的count等于xxx.size(),没啥大区别,也不会不安全。但问题是你干嘛要这样做呢?要么就只用xxx.at(i)来访问不用iterator;要么纯用iterator来访问
直接用it != xxx.end()来控制不是更好,不必再定义新的变量count来操作
要不就范围for循环或者迭代器?