Difference: axure has the most complete functions and the most diverse interactions. Basically, any desired effect can be achieved, especially in the production of PC-side prototypes; but it is not easy to understand. Ink Knife simplifies basic operations and is easy to operate; however, it is not as flexible as AXURE in terms of interactive effects, control combinations, and selection of operation panels.
The operating environment of this article: Windows 10 system, Ink Blade 3.0&&axure 9.0, thinkpad t480 computer.
Prototyping tools include axure, Mockplus, Xiaopiu, Sketch, etc. Among them, the most commonly used prototyping tools include axure and Mockplus.
As a veteran prototyping tool, Axure has the most complete functions and the most diverse interactions. Basically, any desired effect can be achieved, especially in the production of PC-side prototypes.
The shortcomings of Axure are also quite obvious. Axure's dynamic panel, repeater and other functions are powerful, but they are not easy to understand. AXURE's materials are also a pain in the ass. Most PMs will look for corresponding third-party material libraries in the AXURE prototype library and material library and load them. It takes a corresponding amount of time
Mo Dao has a really good experience in APP prototype design. How can I put it? It’s like there is an invisible person helping you, and You build your prototype APP together. (Of course, it will also apply to the design of WeChat mini programs in the future). The dragging and resizing of its controls will naturally match the corresponding master size. No need to worry about moving a little more or selecting a little more. Moreover, Mo Knife's system controls are all based on APP, as well as system platforms IOS and Android, so you can first select the corresponding device layout, which reduces a lot of work.
The shortcoming of Mo Dao is that it is not free. First of all, this is also related to the product positioning of Mo Dao. It is clearly positioned as a mobile prototyping tool, so in terms of interaction In terms of effects, control combinations, and operation panel selection, it is not as flexible as AXURE, and because the effect switching is done in a wired manner, it sometimes makes users feel confused. And the current interactive effect system of the prototype is relatively small, but it basically meets the daily use of all prototypes. In addition, you need to recharge to use the more powerful sharing creation function
In general, Mo Dao and Axure are like Meitu Xiu Xiu and Photoshop. The former simplifies basic operations, much like encapsulating a function, and you can just call it directly. Most of my friends take photos when they go out and they must be beautiful. They choose the effect and share it immediately after they feel good. But if you really want to design a lot of layer combinations and controllably adjust page elements, you still need to use Photoshop, which involves different needs. What do you want to achieve by using this software. Do you want to study the logical structure more or show the prototype effect more?
Related recommendations: "Programming Video Course"
The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between ink knife and axure. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
