std::forward가 ID 템플릿을 사용하여 템플릿 인수 공제를 비활성화하는 이유는 무엇입니까?

<code class="cpp">template<class _Ty> inline
_Ty&amp;&amp; forward(typename identity<_Ty>::type&amp; _Arg)
{   // forward _Arg, given explicitly specified type parameter
    return ((_Ty&amp;&amp;)_Arg);
}</code>

<code class="cpp">template<typename T>
T&amp;&amp; forward_with_deduction(T&amp;&amp; obj)
{
    return static_cast<T&amp;&amp;>(obj);
}</code>

<code class="cpp">void test(int&amp;){}
void test(const int&amp;){}
void test(int&amp;&amp;){}

template<typename T>
void perfect_forwarder(T&amp;&amp; obj)
{
    test(forward_with_deduction(obj));
}

int main()
{
    int x;
    const int&amp; y(x);
    int&amp;&amp; z = std::move(x);

    test(forward_with_deduction(7));    //  7 is an int&amp;&amp;, correctly calls test(int&amp;&amp;)
    test(forward_with_deduction(z));    //  z is treated as an int&amp;, calls test(int&amp;)

    //  All the below call test(int&amp;) or test(const int&amp;) because in perfect_forwarder 'obj' is treated as
    //  an int&amp; or const int&amp; (because it is named) so T in forward_with_deduction is deduced as int&amp; 
    //  or const int&amp;. The T&amp;&amp; in static_cast<T&amp;&amp;>(obj) then collapses to int&amp; or const int&amp; - which is not what 
    //  we want in the bottom two cases.
    perfect_forwarder(x);           
    perfect_forwarder(y);           
    perfect_forwarder(std::move(x));
    perfect_forwarder(std::move(y));
}</code>