The compatibility rules of Java function generics ensure type safety. Rules include: same type parameter lists, same type parameter bounds, and contravariant and covariant type parameters. For example, > is compatible with
> (contravariant), while
Compatibility rules for Java function generics
Java generic functions allow us to write code in a type-safe manner, But not following the correct compatibility rules can lead to compile-time errors. Let’s sort out the rules to avoid such problems.
Rule 1: The type parameter lists are the same
Only function types with the same parameter list are compatible. So the following example will result in an error:
publicvoid func1(T v) {} public void func2(U v) {}
Rule 2: Type parameters have the same bounds
Bounds define the allowed values of a generic type. Functions are incompatible if they have different bounds for parameters of the same type. For example:
public> void func1(T v) {} public void func2(T v) {}
Rule 3: Contravariant and covariant type parameters
is type compatible with
. For example,>
is compatible with>
.
type is compatible with
. For example,
is compatible with
.Practical case
Consider the following code:
publicvoid func1(T t) { // 代码... } public void func2(Cat c) { // 代码... }
func1
Expects anAnimal
or an instance of its subclass.func2
Expects aCat
instance. SinceCat
extendsAnimal
,func1
is compatible withfunc2
and can receiveCat
type parameters.
Conclusion
It is crucial to follow the compatibility rules for function generics to avoid compile-time errors and ensure type safety.
The above is the detailed content of Compatibility rules for Java function generics. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!