Which one is better, Kirin 9000 or Dimensity 1100?

In terms of overall performance, Kirin 9000 is slightly better than Dimensity 1100. Its advantages are reflected in: using a more advanced 5nm manufacturing process, a more balanced CPU architecture, a more powerful number of GPU cores, and integrated 5G baseband, thus leading in benchmark tests.

Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 1100 performance comparison

Short answer:Overall performance , Kirin 9000 is slightly better than Dimensity 1100.

Detailed comparison:

1. Manufacturing process

• Kirin 9000: 5nm
• Dimensity 1100: 6nm

More advanced manufacturing process means lower power consumption and higher efficiency.

2. CPU architecture

• Kirin 9000: 1 Cortex-A77 Prime core 3 Cortex-A77 large cores 4 Cortex-A55 small cores
• Dimensity 1100: 4 Cortex-A78 large cores and 4 Cortex-A55 small cores

The Kirin 9000’s CPU architecture is more balanced, accounting for a slight share of high performance and the number of large cores Advantage.

3. GPU architecture

• Kirin 9000: Mali-G78 MP22
• Dimensity 1100: Mali-G77 MC9

Kirin 9000 has more GPU cores and stronger theoretical graphics performance.

4. 5G network

• Kirin 9000: integrated 5G baseband
• Dimensity 1100: plug-in 5G baseband

The integrated 5G baseband of Kirin 9000 saves power and makes the network connection more stable.

5. Benchmark Tests
In benchmark tests (such as Geekbench and AnTuTu):

• Kirin 9000 generally performs better in single-core and multi-core performance Xanax is ahead of Dimensity 1100.

Conclusion:

Based on the above comparison, Kirin 9000 is slightly better than Dimensity 1100 in terms of overall performance. It has certain advantages in CPU architecture, GPU performance and 5G network. However, which chip to choose depends on the user's needs and priorities in different aspects.

The above is the detailed content of Which one is better, Kirin 9000 or Dimensity 1100?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!