U.S. judge rules: Art works created by artificial intelligence do not deserve copyright protection

According to The Hollywood Reporter, U.S. Federal District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell ruled on Friday that AI-generated artwork cannot obtain copyright protection. She heard a lawsuit against the U.S. Copyright Office in which plaintiff Stephen Thaler used the Creativity Machine algorithm he created to create an AI-generated image, but was denied copyright by the Copyright Office. application.

This site has noticed that Thaler has repeatedly attempted to copyright the image as a "work for hire of the owner of the Creativity Machine" so that the Creativity Machine could be listed as author of the work and Thaler as its owner, but he was always rejected. After the U.S. Copyright Office's final rejection last year, Thaler sued the Copyright Office, claiming its rejection was "arbitrary, capricious... and inconsistent with the law." But Judge Howell didn’t think so. In her decision, Judge Howell wrote that copyright is never granted to a work “without any guiding human hand,” adding that “human creations are copyrightable. Cornerstone Requirements”. This is evidenced by past cases she cited, such as the one involving a monkey taking a selfie. Instead, Judge Howell noted that in one case, a woman compiled a book using a notebook filled with "words she believed were dictated by a supernatural "voice." Copyright protected.

Judge Howell also said that we are gradually entering a new copyright area involving artistic works created by artificial intelligence, which will raise challenging questions about the degree of human input required in these works. . He also pointed out that artificial intelligence models are often trained on existing works. Stephen Thaler plans to appeal the case. "We disagree with the court's interpretation of copyright law," his attorney, Ryan Abbot of Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP, said, according to Bloomberg Law, which also quoted a statement from the U.S. Copyright Office saying I think the court's decision was correct.

The above is the detailed content of U.S. judge rules: Art works created by artificial intelligence do not deserve copyright protection. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!