Is pseudo-static or true static better?

Is pseudo-static or true static better?

From the perspective of SEO, that is, from the perspective of website optimization, the shorter the ULR level, the better. There are generally more true static levels than pseudo-static, so pseudo-static is better.

There are five advantages of pseudo-static:

1. Easy maintenance. The web page changes automatically every day, so no maintenance is required or the amount of maintenance is greatly reduced.

2. It can easily achieve search engine optimization and be easily included by search engines.

3. The length of the URL is shortened, and the actual path of the file is hidden to improve security and make it easier for users to remember and input.

4. It occupies a relatively small space and does not occupy nearly as much space as pure static.

5. Security performance hides or encrypts the URL address so that hackers cannot find the real dynamic page. At the same time, dynamic files do not require high permissions, thus avoiding the injection of Trojans.

The biggest disadvantage of pseudo-static is that it will occupy a certain amount of CPU usage and increase the server's response time.

1. Since true and false static and pseudo-static have the same effect on search engines, we can choose pseudo-static. After all, its advantage is that pure static is irreplaceable.

2. Extensive use of pseudo-static will cause CPU overload, so as long as we don’t use it extensively, the design uses corresponding compilation caching technology online, which has been well optimized and solved this problem. .

The above is the detailed content of Is pseudo-static or true static better?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!