Secure vs. Performant Random Number Generation: `random_int()` vs. `mt_rand()`

Use random_int() for security-sensitive tasks like tokens, passwords, and salts because it is cryptographically secure, relying on OS-level entropy sources such as /dev/urandom or CryptGenRandom. 2. Use mt_rand() for non-security purposes like games, simulations, or array shuffling where speed is crucial and predictability is not a concern, as it uses the fast but predictable Mersenne Twister algorithm. 3. Never use mt_rand() when unpredictability is required, as it can be reverse-engineered, while random_int() should be reserved for cases where security outweighs performance needs, ensuring the right balance between safety and efficiency.

When generating random numbers in PHP, choosing between random_int() and mt_rand() often comes down to a trade-off between security and performance. While both functions generate random integers, they serve different purposes and are not interchangeable in all contexts.

? Security: random_int() Is Cryptographically Secure

random_int() was introduced in PHP 7.0 specifically to provide cryptographically secure random integers. It uses a secure random source provided by the operating system:

• On Linux: /dev/urandom or getrandom() system call
• On Windows: CryptGenRandom or BCryptGenRandom
• On other systems: equivalent CSPRNG (Cryptographically Secure Pseudorandom Number Generator)

This makes random_int() suitable for:

• Generating session tokens
• Creating password reset keys
• Producing CSRF tokens
• Any scenario where predictability could be exploited

$token = bin2hex(random_int(100000, 999999)); // Safe for security-sensitive use

Because it relies on OS-level entropy, random_int() is slower than mt_rand(), especially under high load or on systems with limited entropy.

⚡ Performance: mt_rand() Is Fast but Not Secure

mt_rand() uses the Mersenne Twister algorithm, a fast and reliable PRNG (Pseudorandom Number Generator) that’s excellent for non-security purposes.

It's ideal for:

• Shuffling arrays
• Simulations or games
• Pagination offsets
• Any case where speed matters and security doesn’t

$random_index = mt_rand(0, count($items) - 1);

However, mt_rand() is predictable. Given enough output, an attacker can reverse-engineer the internal state and predict future values. This makes it unsuitable for security-related tasks.

Also note:

• mt_rand() must be seeded manually (though PHP does this automatically on first use)
• Its randomness, while statistically good, isn’t cryptographically strong
• It’s significantly faster than random_int() — often by an order of magnitude

When to Use Which?

? Never use mt_rand() for anything that must be unpredictable to attackers.

Practical Example: Benchmark Comparison

$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i  ) {
    mt_rand(1, 1000);
}
echo "mt_rand(): " . (microtime(true) - $start) . " seconds\n";

$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i  ) {
    random_int(1, 1000);
}
echo "random_int(): " . (microtime(true) - $start) . " seconds\n";

You’ll typically see mt_rand() run 5–10x faster.

Bottom Line

• Use random_int() when security matters — even if it’s slower.
• Use mt_rand() when you need speed and statistical randomness, and there's no risk of exploitation.

Choosing the right function isn’t about which is “better” overall — it’s about matching the tool to the job. Misusing mt_rand() in secure contexts can lead to serious vulnerabilities, while overusing random_int() in performance-critical code can add unnecessary overhead.

Basically: secure when you must, fast when you can.

The above is the detailed content of Secure vs. Performant Random Number Generation: `random_int()` vs. `mt_rand()`. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!