What are some best practices for choosing an appropriate shard key?

Four key points should be followed when choosing the right shard key. 1. Priority is given to ensuring uniform data distribution, avoid using enumeration values or low-base numeric fields, and it is recommended to use fields with strong uniqueness such as user_id and order_id; 2. Combined with common query patterns, give priority to meeting high-frequency query fields to reduce cross-slice query overhead. If you query according to customer_id, set it as shard key; 3. Avoid frequently updated fields such as status and last_login_time to prevent performance fluctuations due to migration; 4. Consider writing performance and growth trends, and avoid monotonously increasing fields causing write hotspots. You can use a hash shard strategy to disperse pressure, such as hashing the timestamp as a shard key.

Choosing a suitable shard key is one of the key decisions in shard database design. It directly affects the balance of data distribution, query performance and system scalability. If you choose well, the system will be stable and efficient; if you choose poorly, it may cause serious hot issues or query delays.

Here are some practical suggestions to help you choose a shard key that suits your business needs.

1. Consider whether the data distribution is uniform

The first task of shard key is to make the data distributed as evenly as possible in each shard. If a value appears particularly frequently (for example, the status field has only "active" and "inactive"), using it as a shard key will cause some shards to be overloaded, forming "hot spots".

suggestion:

• Avoid using enum values or low-base fields as shard keys.
• Fields with strong uniqueness such as user ID and order number are usually more suitable.
• The distribution ability can be initially judged by counting the number of unique values of the field.

For example:

• In the user table, user_id is usually a good candidate.
• In the order table, order_id or customer_id depends on the specific query mode.

2. Design with common query patterns

shard key is not only used for data distribution, but also affects query paths. If most of your queries are based on a certain field, such as often querying all user orders by user_id , then this field is very suitable as a shard key.

suggestion:

• Ensure that commonly used query conditions can utilize shard keys, so that a single shard execution can be located to reduce the overhead of cross-slice queries.
• If multiple query modes conflict, the requirements for high-frequency query are preferred.
• For scenarios that require cross-slice aggregation, perform performance expectations evaluation.

For example:

• If you often check orders based on customer_id , setting customer_id as shard key can improve efficiency.
• If you have the need to check orders by time range, you may want to consider compound shard keys or introduce index assistance.

3. Avoid frequent updates of fields as shard keys

Some fields, although they appear to be evenly distributed, will cause documents to migrate between shards once they are modified, which can lead to additional overhead.

suggestion:

• shard key Once selected, try not to change it.
• Avoid using frequently changed fields like status and last_login_time .
• If you do need to support dynamically changing data models, consider decoupling shard key and business logic.

for example:

• In MongoDB, if the shard key of a document is updated, the migration of chunk may be triggered.
• Although this migration is done automatically, it can cause performance fluctuations during large-scale writes.

4. Consider writing performance and growth trends

In addition to read operations, write mode is also important. If new data is always concentrated on a shard, it will create a write bottleneck.

suggestion:

• Using monotonically increasing fields (such as auto-increment ID) as shard keys can cause hotspots to be written, because all new records will enter the same shard.
• You can consider using a hash sharding strategy to disperse the writing pressure.
• If the business allows it, you can do some preprocessing at the application layer, such as hashing the timestamp as a shard key.

For example:

• The timestamp field itself is not suitable as a key for range shards, but if hash shards are used, it can effectively disperse the writes.
• Some databases (such as MongoDB) support hash indexing, which can simplify this process.

Basically these are the key points. Choosing shard key is not an absolutely scientific issue, but rather a balance between data distribution, query efficiency and write performance. Sometimes there is no perfect answer, and you can only make the most reasonable choices based on the characteristics of the business.

The above is the detailed content of What are some best practices for choosing an appropriate shard key?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!