What are the Most Efficient and Safe Methods for Copying Files in C ?

How to Copy a File Efficiently and Safely

When copying files, it's essential to consider efficiency and safety to prevent data loss and ensure the integrity of the copied file. Several methods can be used, each with its strengths and weaknesses:

1. C Standard Library (iostream):

#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>

int main() {
  std::ifstream source("from.ogv", std::ios::binary);
  std::ofstream destination("to.ogv", std::ios::binary);
  destination << source.rdbuf();
}

Advantages: Simple and intuitive. Safe as it uses standard streams.

Disadvantages: Not as efficient as lower-level methods.

2. POSIX (open, read, write):

#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int main() {
  int source = open("from.ogv", O_RDONLY, 0);
  int destination = open("to.ogv", O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0644);
  char buffer[BUFSIZ];
  while ((size_t)read(source, buffer, BUFSIZ) > 0) {
    write(destination, buffer, size);
  }
}

Advantages: Efficient and low-level.

Disadvantages: Not as safe as standard streams. Requires manual memory management.

3. mmap() System Call:

#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>

int main() {
  int source = open("from.ogv", O_RDONLY, 0);
  int destination = open("to.ogv", O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0644);
  struct stat stat_source;
  fstat(source, &stat_source);
  char *source_ptr = (char *)mmap(NULL, stat_source.st_size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, source, 0);
  char *destination_ptr = (char *)mmap(NULL, stat_source.st_size, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, destination, 0);
  memcpy(destination_ptr, source_ptr, stat_source.st_size);
}

Advantages: Efficient and fast. No need for explicit memory management.

Disadvantages: Complex to implement and requires manual memory mapping.

4. boost::filesystem::copy_file:

#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>

int main() {
  boost::filesystem::copy_file("from.ogv", "to.ogv", boost::filesystem::copy_option::overwrite_if_exists);
}

Advantages: Portable and easy to use. Robust and safe in case of errors.

Disadvantages: Requires an external library. May not be as efficient as low-level methods.

Factors to Consider:

• Efficiency: POSIX and mmap() are the most efficient methods, while iostream is slower.
• Safety: Standard streams (iostream) are the safest, followed by boost::filesystem::copy_file. POSIX and mmap() require careful memory management to avoid errors.
• Portability: boost::filesystem::copy_file is portable across different operating systems. POSIX and mmap() are specific to Unix-like systems.

Recommendations:

For general-purpose file copying with safety as a priority, iostream or boost::filesystem::copy_file is recommended.

For maximum efficiency and performance, POSIX or mmap() can be used, but extra care should be taken to ensure proper memory management and error handling.

The above is the detailed content of What are the Most Efficient and Safe Methods for Copying Files in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!