Why Does C Require Casting with `malloc()` While C Doesn't?

Casting in C vs. C for malloc()

Unlike C, in C , one requires a type cast when using the malloc() function. This stems from the difference in the way void pointers get handled.

In C, implicit type conversions exist between void pointers and other types, which allows the return value of malloc() (a void pointer) to be directly assigned to different pointer types without an explicit cast.

In C , however, this implicit conversion does not occur, and therefore one must manually cast the result to the desired pointer type, as seen in the example:

int *int_ptr = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));

In C, casting the result of malloc() can mask errors if one forgets to include the necessary header or lacks a declaration for malloc() in scope. By casting, the warning that the compiler would normally issue for assigning an integer (the assumed return type without a declaration) to a pointer gets suppressed, potentially leading to runtime problems due to incorrect pointer values.

Modern C recommends utilizing the new and delete operators for memory management instead of malloc() and free(). These operators provide type-safe memory allocation and automatic cleanup, eliminating the need for explicit casting and reducing potential errors.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does C Require Casting with `malloc()` While C Doesn't?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!