Which Python String Formatting Method is Best: %, .format, or F-strings?

String Formatting: A Comparison of %, .format, and F-Strings

Python offers several string formatting methods, each with its strengths and limitations. Let's explore them:

Differences Between Methods

While all three methods have the same effect, they differ in their structure:

• % (Python < 2.6): Replaces placeholders with corresponding arguments, and supports both positional and keyword arguments.
• .format (Python 2.6 ): Uses a more flexible syntax with named arguments, and allows for more complex formatting options.
• F-strings (Python 3.6 ): Provide a concise and intuitive syntax using f-prefix and curly braces.

Syntax Comparison

name = "Alice"

# % formatting
"Hello %s" % name

# .format formatting
"Hello {}" .format(name)
"Hello {kwarg}" .format(kwarg=name)

# F-string formatting
f"Hello {name}"

Runtime Performance

String formatting is an intrinsically slow operation due to the creation of new strings. To avoid performance penalties, consider:

• Using string concatenation instead of formatting for simple cases.
• Using a template library like Jinja2 for complex formatting tasks.
• Precompiling formatting strings and caching the results for frequent use.

Conclusion

For backwards compatibility with Python 2.5, % can be used. However, .format offers greater flexibility and readability, making it the preferred option for most cases. F-strings provide a concise and intuitive syntax but are only available in Python 3.6 .

The above is the detailed content of Which Python String Formatting Method is Best: %, .format, or F-strings?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!