In the provided code, two functions are introduced: concurrentStruct() and concurrentStructWithMuLock(). Both functions concurrently read and write a struct, but the former does so without locks and generates race warnings. Conversely, the latter uses a read-write mutex to synchronize access, resulting in no race warnings.
As the error messages indicate, a data race occurs when:
In concurrentStruct(), this situation arises because the key field of the Metadata struct is accessed and modified by multiple goroutines without any synchronization.
While concurrentStruct() does not use locks, the use of anonymous goroutines running indefinitely leads to potential race conditions. These goroutines continuously read, modify, and write the key field without considering the actions of other goroutines.
In contrast to concurrentStruct(), concurrentStructWithMuLock() employs a read-write mutex to synchronize access to the key field. This ensures mutual exclusion, preventing multiple goroutines from simultaneously modifying the field. As a result, no race conditions occur, and the function runs without warnings.
The concurrentMap() function demonstrates a different type of race condition involving a Go map. While maps are thread-safe in Go, concurrent access to the map for both reads and writes without proper synchronization can lead to fatal errors. Go's runtime includes a lightweight data race detector, which crashes the program when it detects such unsynchronized access to maps as a safeguard against undefined behavior.
The above is the detailed content of How Can Concurrent Read and Write Operations on Go Structs Be Safely Implemented?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!