Reasons to Avoid Inheriting from the C std::string Class
In Effective C , the recommendation to avoid inheriting from std::string is based on its lack of a virtual destructor and its unsuitability as a base class, even for polymorphic purposes. Understanding the specific requirements for a class to qualify as a base class and the consequences of deriving from std::string further clarifies this stance.
Eligibility for Base Class Inheritance
Inheritability in C is tightly coupled with the need for polymorphic behavior. Public inheritance should only be used when a class intends to be accessed through pointers or references, allowing for dynamic binding. Otherwise, free functions or composition are the preferred mechanisms for code reuse.
std::string as a Base Class
In the case of std::string, the absence of a virtual destructor prevents it from supporting polymorphic behavior effectively. Moreover, its internal design is not intended for use as a base class.
Issues with Deriving from std::string
Deriving from std::string introduces potential problems due to the slicing behavior in C . For example, if a function expects a std::string parameter, passing a derived object will result in a truncated copy that excludes additional members of the derived class. This can lead to inconsistencies and undefined behavior.
Preventing Non-Polymorphic Base Class Usage
To prevent clients from using a base class purely for reusability as if it were a polymorphic base class, the following techniques can be employed:
The above is the detailed content of Why Should You Avoid Inheriting from the C std::string Class?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!