How Does Meyers' Singleton Implementation Guarantee Singularity and Thread Safety?

How Meyers' Singleton Implementation Enforces Singularity

In traditional singleton patterns, a class maintains a reference to a single instance and returns that instance on demand. However, Meyers' implementation, utilizing the static keyword, achieves singleness through static storage duration.

Under the hood, this implementation can be seen as equivalent to a C 98 implementation involving a global guard variable to ensure only one instance exists. When the instance() function is called, it checks if the instance has been created. If not, the guard variable is set, and a new instance is allocated. Otherwise, the existing instance is returned.

Thread Safety

Meyers' implementation is thread-safe due to the use of a static guard variable. This variable is atomically updated during instance creation, ensuring that only one thread can create the instance at a time.

Meyers vs. Wikipedia Implementation

Both Meyers' and Wikipedia's implementations follow the singleton pattern. However, there are some key differences:

Simplicity: Meyers' implementation is more concise and requires less boilerplate code.
Efficiency: Meyers' implementation can be potentially more efficient as it doesn't use synchronization mechanisms.
Thread Safety: Both implementations are thread-safe, but Wikipedia's uses explicit synchronization, which may introduce additional overhead.
Conclusion

Meyers' lazy initialization technique effectively enforces the singleton pattern and provides a thread-safe implementation. Its simplicity and efficiency make it a suitable choice for singleton implementation in C .

The above is the detailed content of How Does Meyers' Singleton Implementation Guarantee Singularity and Thread Safety?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!