The interface{} type, a significant aspect of Go programming, allows for dynamic handling of values, but its usage can often lead to misunderstandings.
A common misconception arises when using interface{} as a function parameter and encountering an issue with json.Unmarshal. The following code snippet demonstrates this bug:
func test(i interface{}) { j := []byte(`{ "foo": "bar" }`) fmt.Printf("%T\n", i) fmt.Printf("%T\n", &i) json.Unmarshal(j, &i) fmt.Printf("%T\n", i) } func main() { test(Test{}) } type Test struct { Foo string }
When run, this code unexpectedly transforms the struct Test{} into a map[string]interface{} after being unmarshalled, as seen in the output:
main.Test *interface {} map[string]interface {}
The misunderstanding lies in the nature of the interface{} type. It's not an empty container as some may assume, but rather a wrapper for a value-type pair. When the non-pointer Test{} is passed to test(), the json.Unmarshal function expects a pointer, causing it to create a new map[string]interface{} value instead.
To resolve this issue, one must pass a pointer to the interface{} parameter.
func test(i interface{}) { j := []byte(`{ "foo": "bar" }`) fmt.Printf("%T\n", i) fmt.Printf("%T\n", &i) json.Unmarshal(j, i) fmt.Printf("%T\n", i) fmt.Println(i) } func main() { test(&Test{}) }
This modification ensures that a pointer to a pointer is passed to the function, allowing json.Unmarshal to unmarshal the JSON data correctly.
It's crucial to remember that interface{} requires careful usage to avoid unexpected behavior. Understanding its underlying implementation and its implications on functions like json.Unmarshal is essential for effective Go development.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `json.Unmarshal` Unexpectedly Change My Struct When Using `interface{}`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!