Sphinx vs. SOLR: Which Standalone Full-Text Search Server is Right for My Application?

Choosing a Stand-alone Full-Text Search Server: A Comparison of Sphinx and SOLR

Introduction

For applications requiring robust full-text search capabilities, selecting a suitable server is crucial. This article investigates the features, similarities, and differences between two popular options: Sphinx and SOLR.

Comparison

Both Sphinx and SOLR are stand-alone servers that meet the following requirements:

• Stand-alone operation
• Bulk indexing from SQL queries
• Free software
• Support for Linux and MySQL

Similarities

• High performance for large data volumes
• Extensive user bases and commercial support
• Cross-platform client API bindings
• Distribution for scalability

Differences

• Licensing: Sphinx is GPLv2, while SOLR is Apache2-licensed, potentially requiring a commercial license for embedding or extending in commercial applications.
• Ecosystem: SOLR is built on Lucene, benefiting from its extensive user base and feature updates. Sphinx focuses on tight integration with RDBMSs, particularly MySQL.
• Extensibility: SOLR supports indexing proprietary formats, spell-checking, and faceting out of the box. Sphinx requires more effort for faceting and cannot index proprietary formats.
• Partial Index Updates: Sphinx does not allow partial index updates for field data, while SOLR does.
• Document IDs: Sphinx requires unique unsigned non-zero integer document IDs, whereas SOLR allows flexible key formats, including strings and non-unique keys.
• Field Collapsing: SOLR supports field collapsing to avoid duplicate results, which Sphinx lacks.
• Direct Document Retrieval: SOLR can retrieve whole documents, reducing roundtrip delays to an external data store. Sphinx only retrieves document IDs.

Other Alternatives

ElasticSearch is another popular option built on Lucene, offering similar features to SOLR.

Specific Use Cases

• For applications that require proprietary format indexing, spell-checking, or faceting, SOLR is a suitable choice.
• For integration with MySQL and ease of configuration, Sphinx excels.

Conclusion

Both Sphinx and SOLR are capable full-text search servers. SOLR's Lucene foundation provides advanced features and a vast ecosystem, while Sphinx's tight RDBMS integration and simple configuration make it suitable for specific scenarios. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the specific requirements of the application.

The above is the detailed content of Sphinx vs. SOLR: Which Standalone Full-Text Search Server is Right for My Application?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!