Home > Backend Development > C++ > When Should I Use Forwarding References (auto&&) in Range-Based For Loops?

When Should I Use Forwarding References (auto&&) in Range-Based For Loops?

DDD
Release: 2024-12-11 04:50:08
Original
1019 people have browsed it

When Should I Use Forwarding References (auto&&) in Range-Based For Loops?

Understanding the Advantages of Forwarding References in Range-Based For Loops

In range-based for loops, the question of when to use forwarding references (e.g., auto&&) over explicit references (auto& or const auto&) arises. While const auto& is typically suitable for read-only operations, auto&& may offer certain benefits in obscure corner cases.

Identifying the Performance Gain

One potential advantage of forwarding references lies in scenarios where the sequence iterator returns a proxy reference and non-const operations are required on that reference. An example is the modification of elements in a vector of boolean values, as illustrated below:

#include <vector>

int main()
{
    std::vector<bool> v(10);
    for (auto& e : v)  // Compiler error: cannot bind rvalue reference to non-const lvalue
        e = true;
}
Copy after login

This code will not compile because the iterator of a vector of booleans returns an rvalue reference, which cannot be bound to a non-const lvalue reference (auto&). Using a forwarding reference (auto&&) resolves this issue:

#include <vector>

int main()
{
    std::vector<bool> v(10);
    for (auto&& e : v)
        e = true;  // Valid: forwarding reference can bind to rvalue reference
}
Copy after login

Cautious Application

While forwarding references can address such corner cases, it is crucial to use them judiciously. Gratuitous use of auto&& can raise questions and warrant clear comments to explain its necessity, such as:

#include <vector>

int main()
{
    std::vector<bool> v(10);
    // using auto&& so that I can handle the rvalue reference
    //   returned for the vector<bool> case
    for (auto&& e : v)
        e = true;
}
Copy after login

In cases where a loop consistently handles proxy references, auto can also be used instead of auto&& without performance implications. However, auto&& becomes a more suitable solution when the loop switches between handling proxy references and other references.

The above is the detailed content of When Should I Use Forwarding References (auto&&) in Range-Based For Loops?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template