Using std::unique_ptr with Incomplete Types
In the pimpl idiom, using std::unique_ptr with an incomplete type can lead to compilation errors. Consider the following code:
class window { window(const rectangle& rect); private: class window_impl; // defined elsewhere std::unique_ptr<window_impl> impl_; // won't compile };
The error typically arises from attempting to use sizeof on an incomplete type, as seen in
The Problem
The issue stems from the fact that the compiler needs to know the size of the incomplete type to determine the allocation for the std::unique_ptr. This information is unavailable, resulting in the compilation error.
The Solution
To address this problem, it is essential to implement a destructor for the class holding the unique_ptr. This is because the default destructor generated by the compiler requires a complete declaration of the type. Here's an example:
class foo { class impl; std::unique_ptr<impl> impl_; public: foo(); // You may need a def. constructor to be defined elsewhere ~foo(); // Implement (with {}, or with = default;) where impl is complete };
By implementing the destructor, the compiler gains the necessary knowledge to handle the destruction of the unique_ptr.
Special Cases
In certain scenarios, using unique_ptr with incomplete types may not be possible:
class impl; struct ptr_impl : std::unique_ptr<impl> { ~ptr_impl(); // Implement (empty body) elsewhere } impl_;
By following these guidelines, you can effectively use unique_ptr with incomplete types, ensuring a smooth compilation process.
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Use `std::unique_ptr` with Incomplete Types in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!