One of the powerful features of C , Curiously Recurring Template Pattern (CRTP), enables static polymorphism. This allows for compile-time flexibility in determining the type of objects created based on the template arguments. However, extending CRTP to allow modification of function return types based on derived types poses a challenge.
Consider the following code that attempts to generalize CRTP:
template <typename derived_t> class base { public: typedef typename derived_t::value_type value_type; value_type foo() { return static_cast<derived_t*>(this)->foo(); } }; template <typename T> class derived : public base<derived<T>> { public: typedef T value_type; value_type foo() { return T(); } };
This code fails to compile in Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 due to the error: 'value_type' is not a member of 'derived
The issue stems from the fact that derived is incomplete when used as a template argument for base in its base class list. To address this, a common workaround is to use a traits class template.
Introducing the base_traits template:
template <typename derived_t> struct base_traits;
Redefining the base class using the traits:
template <typename derived_t> struct base { typedef typename base_traits<derived_t>::value_type value_type; value_type base_foo() { return base_traits<derived_t>::call_foo(static_cast<derived_t*>(this)); } };
And specializing base_traits for derived:
template <typename T> struct base_traits<derived<T> > { typedef T value_type; static value_type call_foo(derived<T>* x) { return x->derived_foo(); } };
This approach allows for the use of both types and functions from the derived class through the traits. By specializing base_traits for each template argument, you can provide the required members for each derived class.
The above is the detailed content of How Can We Address Compile-Time Errors When Using CRTP and Typedef in C Derived Classes?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!