In object-oriented programming, generics play a crucial role in enhancing type safety and code reusability. In Java generics, the use of wildcards such as extends T> and
Consider the following example using JUnit with Hamcrest matchers:
Map<String, Class<? extends Serializable>> expected = null; Map<String, Class<java.util.Date>> result = null; assertThat(result, is(expected));
This code fails to compile due to a mismatch between the generic type parameters in the assertThat method signature and the actual types involved.
To understand why using extends T> resolves the issue, let's delve into the concept of covariance. In Java, arrays are covariant, meaning that if a type T is a subtype of S, then the corresponding arrays T[] and S[] are also subtypes.
In the given example, the expected map can hold instances of Class objects representing subclasses of Serializable. On the other hand, the result map can only hold Class objects representing Date class. By using extends T>, the assertThat method can accept matchers that check if a value is an instance of any class that extends Serializable, including Date class.
The assertThat method in JUnit is generic to ensure that an appropriate matcher is passed in for the result type. By generically typing it as
While switching assertThat's parameter list to Matcher extends T> addresses the compilation issue, it does introduce a potential drawback. This broadened parameter list permits any matcher that operates on a type extending T, which may lead to incorrect matching logic in certain scenarios.
Understanding the distinction between extends T> and
The above is the detailed content of What's the difference between `` and `. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!