Preferring instanceof over getClass() in .equals() Implementations
When generating .equals() methods in Eclipse, developers are presented with the choice between using "getClass()" or "instanceof" to compare object types. While Eclipse defaults to using "getClass()", it is generally preferable to opt for "instanceof" instead.
Reasons for Preferring instanceof
Best Practices for Null Checks
Regarding null checks, it is indeed a good practice to remove the "if (obj == null)" statement when using "instanceof". This is because "instanceof" guarantees that "obj" is an instance of the relevant class, and a null object cannot be an instance of any class.
Supporting Arguments
Josh Bloch, the author of "Effective Java," advocates for using "instanceof" in .equals() implementations. He argues that it ensures the proper adherence to the Liskov Substitution Principle and prevents surprising behavior in collections that rely on the equals method.
Additional support for this approach can be found in an answer on Stack Overflow and in the third chapter of Bloch's book, "Effective Java."
The above is the detailed content of Should You Use `instanceof` or `getClass()` in Java\'s `.equals()` Method?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!