TypeScript external modules provide a mechanism for structuring and organizing types. However, the usage of namespaces within these modules can be confusing and counterintuitive.
The key issue with using namespaces in external modules arises from the fact that each module exists as a distinct entity. Attempting to distribute types across multiple modules using namespaces results in a fragmented and inconvenient organizational structure.
Imagine each candy (type) is placed in its own cup (module). Instead of providing a useful organization, it creates an unnecessary intermediate step. Similarly, namespaces in external modules merely add another layer of indirection without any real benefit.
Namespaces were historically used in languages like C# to mitigate naming collisions and provide organizational structure. However, these concerns are addressed by the file-based organization of external modules. Each file represents a distinct module, eliminating the need for namespaces to resolve naming conflicts.
Instead of relying on namespaces, consider adopting the following best practices:
Be wary of the following scenarios that indicate improper module structuring:
By adhering to these guidelines and avoiding common pitfalls, you can effectively organize types in external modules without the need for namespaces.
The above is the detailed content of Why Are Namespaces Unnecessary in TypeScript External Modules?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!