Should You Use C \'s Written Logical Operators (and, or, not)?

Exploring Alternate Logical Operators in C : Written Versions of and, or, not

The presence of and, or, and not as logical operators in C has often raised questions about their validity and usage. Despite being listed as operators, these written versions are rarely seen in practice.

Origins and Implementation

These operators originated in C's header, which provided definitions to support keyboards lacking symbols for logical operators like & and |. The C standard adopted them as alternate tokens, meaning they are valid spellings for the same underlying operations as their standard counterparts (& and ||).

Readability and Usage

The written versions of logical operators offer potential advantages in readability. However, their rarity makes them less familiar, potentially confusing to readers. The widespread use of & and || has established them as the standard syntax, making the alternative versions less appealing.

Valid Syntax and Compatibility

These alternate operators are fully valid in C , and no additional headers are required to use them. They are not remnants of C compatibility but are integral to the C language.

Conclusion

While the written versions of logical operators provide an alternative syntax, their rarity and potential for confusion have limited their widespread adoption. The standard operators & and || remain the preferred choice for most developers, ensuring clarity and familiarity in code.

The above is the detailed content of Should You Use C \'s Written Logical Operators (and, or, not)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!