When Does the Compiler Substitute `Type&` in C Conversion Operators?

Understanding Conversion Operators in C

In the realm of object-oriented programming, conversion operators play a crucial role in bridging the gap between different data types. These operators allow an object to be treated as another type, broadening its usability.

Consider the following example to illustrate how conversion operators work:

template <class Type>
class smartref {
public:
    smartref() : data(new Type) { }
    operator Type&() { return *data; }
private:
    Type* data;
};

class person {
public:
    void think() { std::cout << "I am thinking"; }
};

int main() {
    smartref<person> p;
    p.think(); // why does not the compiler try substituting Type&?
}

In this example, a smartref class is defined as a template class, which can hold an instance of any type Type. The conversion operator operator Type&() is implemented to cast the smartref object to the underlying Type reference.

When the Compiler Substitutes Type&

The compiler will substitute Type& in the conversion operator under the following circumstances:

• Argument Passing: When an object is passed as an argument to a function, the compiler may substitute Type& if the function accepts a reference to Type.
• Reference Binding: When a reference is directly bound to an object, the compiler may substitute Type& if the object is an lvalue.
• Function Pointer Conversion: When an object is converted to a function pointer or reference, the compiler may substitute Type& if the function pointer or reference matches the signature of the conversion function.
• Non-Class Type Conversion: The compiler may use user-defined conversion functions to convert objects to non-class types, such as bool or pointer values.
• Template Conversion Operators: Template conversion operators allow objects to be convertible to any pointer type. However, caution is advised when using these operators as they can lead to ambiguity.

In the case of the example provided, the compiler does not substitute Type& within the think() function call because it is called on an object of type smartref, which is not an lvalue reference to Type&.

The above is the detailed content of When Does the Compiler Substitute `Type&` in C Conversion Operators?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!