Undefined Constants and #if Condition Evaluation in C and C
In preprocessor logic, macros and constants often play crucial roles. One common scenario arises when dealing with undefined constants in #if conditions. Here, we'll explore whether relying on a predictable behavior from these undefined constants is valid.
Problem:
Developers often assume that undefined constants take on a value of 0 when used in #if evaluations. Is this assumption reliable, or should we expect undefined behavior from undefined constants?
Answer:
Yes, you can rely on this assumption. The C99 standard clearly specifies in §6.10.1 ¶3:
After all replacements due to macro expansion and the defined unary operator have been performed, all remaining identifiers are replaced with the pp-number 0
Similarly, the C standard (§16.1 ¶4) dictates:
After all replacements due to macro expansion and the defined unary operator have been performed, all remaining identifiers and keywords, except for true and false, are replaced with the pp-number 0
In other words, after macro expansions and other preprocessing steps, any undefined identifier or constant that appears in an #if condition is automatically replaced with the value 0. This behavior is consistent across C and C .
This predictable behavior allows developers to conveniently use undefined constants as flags or placeholders in #if conditions without risking undefined outcomes or errors. When the undefined constant is not defined before the preprocessing phase, the compiler treats it as 0 by default.
The above is the detailed content of Do Undefined Constants Evaluate to 0 in #if Conditions in C and C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!