In C , when overloading methods that accept multiple types, it's essential to be aware of potential ambiguity. As illustrated below:
<code class="cpp">class Output { public: static void Print(bool value) { std::cout << (value ? "True" : "False"); } static void Print(std::string value) { std::cout << value; } };</code>
If we attempt to call the Print method with a string literal as follows:
<code class="cpp">Output::Print("Hello World");</code>
Unexpectedly, the output is "True" instead of "Hello World". Why?
In C , string literals like "Hello World" are not of type std::string but rather an array of constant characters. However, they can be implicitly converted to a bool value. This conversion, known as a standard conversion sequence, is preferred by the compiler over the user-defined conversion constructor for std::string.
During overload resolution, the compiler determines the best function to call for each argument. The preference is given to standard conversion sequences over user-defined conversions. In our case, the standard conversion from "Hello World" to bool is considered better than the user-defined conversion to std::string.
To ensure that the std::string overload is used, we need to explicitly pass an std::string argument:
<code class="cpp">Output::Print(std::string("Hello World"));</code>
This resolves the ambiguity and correctly outputs "Hello World".
Understanding implicit conversions and their impact on overload resolution is crucial in C . By default, standard conversions take precedence over user-defined conversions. Hence, it's essential to be aware of such conversions and make explicit type conversions when necessary to avoid unexpected behavior.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does \'Hello World\' Print as \'True\' in an Overloaded C Print Method?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!