Go HTTP Server Performance: Differences Between ab and wrk Benchmarks
Problem Statement:
When benchmarking a Go HTTP server using both ab and wrk, significant discrepancies in performance measurements were observed, leaving the user puzzled as to the reason behind the vast differences.
Analysis:
Factors Affecting Benchmark Accuracy:
-
Artificiality of Benchmarks: Real-world applications introduce additional factors like database calls and session parsing, leading to lower performance compared to simple "Hello World" responses.
-
Local Machine Limitations: Resource constraints, loopback adapters, and TCP stack tuning can impact benchmark results.
Specific Differences Between ab and wrk:
-
HTTP Version: ab uses HTTP/1.0 and does not support keepalives, while wrk supports HTTP/1.1 and keepalives.
-
Latency: The latency reported by ab was significantly higher than that reported by wrk.
-
Duration: The ab test ran for 12 seconds, while the wrk test ran for 5 seconds.
-
Load Generation: wrk is generally considered a more reliable benchmarking tool and has the ability to generate higher load than ab.
Recommendations:
- Use wrk for more accurate and representative benchmarks.
- Keep in mind the limitations and variances inherent in benchmarking tools.
- Focus on optimizing the server code and understanding resource utilization rather than chasing specific performance figures.
- Benchmarks should be conducted under realistic scenarios with actual workloads.
Scaling with More Cores:
The scaling capabilities of a Go HTTP server with additional cores depend on the specific workload. Single-threaded operations, such as responding with a simple "Hello World" message, show linear scaling. However, for more complex workloads, scaling may become nonlinear due to contention for shared resources or other factors.
The above is the detailed content of Why are Ab and Wrk Benchmarks so Different for Go HTTP Servers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!