Shared Memory in Multiprocessing: Unraveling Copy-On-Write and Reference Counting
Background
In the world of multiprocessing, sharing data among processes presents a crucial question: whether multiple processes access the same physical memory or handle copies of it. The concept of copy-on-write in Linux and reference counting plays a significant role in determining the memory utilization of such processes.
Problem Overview
In a multiprocessing scenario, the question arises whether three large lists (one containing bitarrays and the others containing arrays of integers) will be shared among sub-processes or copied for each one. The sub-processes only require read access to the lists, but the large size of the data structures raises concerns about memory consumption.
Copy-On-Write in Linux
Linux utilizes a copy-on-write memory optimization. Typically, when creating a copy of an object, the new copy shares the same physical memory pages with the original. Any changes made to one of these pages are first copied into a new, exclusive page, ensuring that any subsequent modifications affect only one entity. This optimization reduces memory usage and potential data corruption.
Reference Counting
In Python, each object has a reference count, which tracks the number of variables referencing it. When the reference count reaches zero, the object is deleted by the garbage collector.
However, in the case of multiprocessing, each sub-process creates its own variable referencing the shared list, effectively increasing the reference count. This may lead to the entire list being copied for each sub-process, significantly increasing memory utilization.
The Conundrum
Despite the copy-on-write mechanism in Linux, a common misconception is that the lists will be shared among the sub-processes. However, the reference counting in Python introduces the possibility of entire objects being copied.
Solution: Shared Memory with Python 3.8.0
Thankfully, Python version 3.8.0 introduced 'true' shared memory, providing a mechanism to create memory that is visible to multiple processes without the need for copying. Using the multiprocessing.shared_memory module, developers can allocate shared memory blocks and create NumPy arrays backed by these blocks, enabling efficient data sharing among processes.
Conclusion
Understanding the interplay of copy-on-write and reference counting is crucial in multiprocessing scenarios. While Linux optimizes for memory usage, reference counting may still lead to excessive copying. For large data structures, using the 'true' shared memory introduced in Python 3.8.0 offers a reliable solution for efficient data sharing without the overhead of copying.
The above is the detailed content of How does Python's reference counting affect shared memory in multiprocessing, considering Linux's copy-on-write mechanism?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!