The plaintiff in the 'iQiyi screencasting restriction case' 'fires' again: the second round of the screencasting dispute, four questions about Youku

This website reported on July 25 that the "iQiyi screencasting restriction case" was settled in the first instance this month, and the plaintiff was compensated with 41 days of gold membership VIP time, triggering heated discussions on the Internet. Today, the plaintiff in the case @ Zhu Yuan Lawyer issued an article pointing the finger at another major online video platform - Youku. @ Zhu Yuan Lawyer said on Weibo: Although Youku claims that screencasting does not belong to the rights of VIP members, in actual implementation, it selectively opens the screencasting function to some content. Members' screencasting is like "opening a blind box". This Is it also a case of unclear boundaries of members’ rights and interests, harming consumers’ right to know?

<code>
  1. 优酷，请告诉我，你说投屏不能在电视端使用，为啥有些能投有些不能投？




  2. 优酷，请告诉我，我想分辨哪些能投哪些不能投，为啥标注有“VIP 帧享”“首播”“独播”的，有的能投有的不能投？




  3. 优酷，请告诉我，你说投屏不能在电视端使用，现在部分能使用，这种“部分使用”属于会员协议约定的会员权益还是如爱奇艺所言，这属于会员协议约定权益之外的免费赠与？




  4. 优酷，请告诉我，你说投屏不能在电视端使用，为啥“macbook air”设备上也不能用？




</code>

The full text of this site is as follows:

The above is the detailed content of The plaintiff in the 'iQiyi screencasting restriction case' 'fires' again: the second round of the screencasting dispute, four questions about Youku. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!