《Objective-C编程之道》“第7章单例”中提到用NSAllocateObject来分配可以防止子类分配时候得到父类的对象。
但是据我测试没有任何区别，请知情人士指点。
创建对象代码
+ (Singleton *)sharedInstance { if (uniqueInstance == nil) { uniqueInstance = [[super allocWithZone:nil] init]; // uniqueInstance = NSAllocateObject([self class], 0, nil); } return uniqueInstance; }
测试代码
id child1 = [[Child alloc] init]; NSLog(@"child1 = %@", child1); id child2 = [[Child alloc] init]; NSLog(@"child2 = %@", child2);测试结果
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
This is NSObject Class source code
+ (id) allocWithZone:(NSZone*)z { return NSAllocateObject(self, 0, z); }Refer to this link, because your singleton’s root class may not be nsobject, so use NSAllocateObject directly.
NSProxy is the root class, but it is under cocoa.
The root class under iOS is NSObject, which is the root class, for reference.
Because some singleton implementations will override the +allocWithZone: method and return the singleton directly. This is the implementation given in Apple's documentation. So you have to use NSAllocatObject to create objects
I also had this question, and now I have this answer. There is only one copy of the uniqueInstance variable, and the subclass is shared with the parent class. If the parent class is created first, the subclass [Child alloc] or [Child sharedInstance] will return the parent class. An instance of the class, because the Singleton class overrides the allocWithZone method, and this method returns a uniqueInstance. I don’t know, right?