java - volatile中i++的原子性问题
怪我咯
怪我咯 2017-04-18 10:52:11
0
3
651
/** * @create on 17/3/27 * @description */ public class Main { static volatile int i = 0; public static class PlusTask implements Runnable{ @Override public void run(){ for(int k=0; k<10000; k++) i++; } } public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException{ Thread[] threads = new Thread[10]; for(int i=0;i<10;i++){ threads[i] = new Thread(new PlusTask()); threads[i].start(); } for(int i=0;i<10;i++){ threads[i].join(); } System.out.println(i); } }

请教各位大牛 为什么这里的输出总是小于10000? 已经调用了thread.join

怪我咯
怪我咯

走同样的路,发现不同的人生

reply all (3)
Peter_Zhu

You may need this:

public void run() { for (int k = 0; k < 10000; k++) synchronized (Main.class) { i++; } }

or define oneAtomicInteger

  • volatile only functions as a multi-thread cache consistency, and does not guarantee that only one thread will write variables at a certain time.

    Ty80

    volitile does not guarantee atomicity

      刘奇

      The problem of multi-threaded operation of shared variables. Volitale cannot guarantee the atomicity of composite operations, which means that the latter thread cannot always see the modified value i of the previous thread. The solution is to lock or atomically operate

        Latest Downloads
        More>
        Web Effects
        Website Source Code
        Website Materials
        Front End Template
        About us Disclaimer Sitemap
        php.cn:Public welfare online PHP training,Help PHP learners grow quickly!