My use case here:
Is there a better design pattern?
let twoStagePromise = (state: boolean): Promise<{ ready: boolean, wait: Promise<any>; }> => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
try {
if (state) {
resolve({
ready: true,
wait: new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve([1, 2, 3]);
})
});
} else {
resolve({
ready: false,
wait: new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
setTimeout(() => { resolve([1, 2, 3]); }, 1000);
})
});
}
} catch (e) {
reject(e);
}
});
};
twoStagePromise(false).then((data) => {
if (!data.ready) {
console.log('loading...');
}
return data.wait;
}).then((result) => {
console.log("recieved result", result);
}).catch((error) => {
console.log("try-catch failed or inner promise failed")
});
After reading some comments, I simplified the code significantly:
let twoStagePromise = (state: boolean): Promise<number[] | Promise<number[]>> => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
try {
if (state) {
resolve([1, 2, 3]);
} else {
resolve(new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(() => { resolve([1,2,3]) }, 1000)))
}
} catch (e) {
reject(e);
}
});
};
twoStagePromise(false).then((dataOrPromise) => {
if (dataOrPromise instanceof Promise) {
console.log('loading...');
}
return dataOrPromise // continue the promise chain by returning the promise or data
}).then((result) => {
console.log("recieved result", result);
}).catch((error) => {
console.log("try-catch failed or inner promise failed", error)
});
You can create a function that explicitly returns a value or its promise. You can easily
awaitanyway. To check if the result is in sync, useresult instanceof Promise