My use case here:
Is there a better design pattern?
let twoStagePromise = (state: boolean): Promise<{ ready: boolean, wait: Promise<any>; }> => { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { try { if (state) { resolve({ ready: true, wait: new Promise((resolve, reject) => { resolve([1, 2, 3]); }) }); } else { resolve({ ready: false, wait: new Promise((resolve, reject) => { setTimeout(() => { resolve([1, 2, 3]); }, 1000); }) }); } } catch (e) { reject(e); } }); }; twoStagePromise(false).then((data) => { if (!data.ready) { console.log('loading...'); } return data.wait; }).then((result) => { console.log("recieved result", result); }).catch((error) => { console.log("try-catch failed or inner promise failed") });
After reading some comments, I simplified the code significantly:
let twoStagePromise = (state: boolean): Promise<number[] | Promise<number[]>> => { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { try { if (state) { resolve([1, 2, 3]); } else { resolve(new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(() => { resolve([1,2,3]) }, 1000))) } } catch (e) { reject(e); } }); }; twoStagePromise(false).then((dataOrPromise) => { if (dataOrPromise instanceof Promise) { console.log('loading...'); } return dataOrPromise // continue the promise chain by returning the promise or data }).then((result) => { console.log("recieved result", result); }).catch((error) => { console.log("try-catch failed or inner promise failed", error) });
You can create a function that explicitly returns a value or its promise. You can easily
await
anyway. To check if the result is in sync, useresult instanceof Promise