In most cases, Swoole has better overall performance because it outperforms Workerman in terms of concurrency, memory consumption, I/O throughput, and network throughput. Its performance benefits are due to C extensions, efficient I/O event loops, and memory management techniques, making it suitable for high-concurrency, high-throughput web applications, real-time applications, and microservices architectures.

Performance comparison between Workerman and Swoole
Conclusion:
In In most cases, Swoole has better overall performance.
Detailed comparison:
Workerman and Swoole are two popular high-performance PHP frameworks used for building web applications and services. They both use asynchronous programming, which means they can handle multiple requests without blocking.
Concurrency:
Swoole has higher concurrency. It can handle tens of thousands of concurrent connections, while Workerman can typically handle thousands of connections.
Memory consumption:
Workerman uses PHP coroutines, while Swoole uses C extensions. Therefore, the memory consumption of Swoole is usually lower than that of Workerman.
I/O throughput:
Swoole has higher I/O throughput than Workerman. This is because Swoole uses C extensions to optimize I/O operations.
Network Throughput:
Swoole also has higher network throughput than Workerman. This is because it uses an efficient network I/O event loop.
Performance Advantages:
Swoole’s performance advantages are due to the following factors:
Applicable scenarios:
The above is the detailed content of Who has better performance, workerman or swoole?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
Why can swoole be resident in memory?
python environment variable configuration
Introduction to the method of intercepting strings in js
what does oem mean
How to open WeChat html file
The difference between java and javaee
What's going on when the ip address is unavailable?
PHP programming software recommendation