Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange

Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange means that there are additional decorations at the beginning and end of the strokes of the characters, and the thickness of the strokes will vary depending on the vertical and horizontal strokes. On the contrary, sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange does not have these additional decorations, and the stroke thickness is roughly the same.

Fonts such as Times and Times New Roman are all Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts, while Arial and Helvetica are sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts.

General comparison between Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange and sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange

• Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts are easier to identify and therefore more readable. On the contrary, sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange is more eye-catching, but in the case of text reading, sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange can easily cause problems in letter recognition, often causing back-and-forth re-reading and confusion of ascending and descending lines.
• Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange emphasizes the beginning and end of letter strokes, so it is easier to identify the continuity.
• Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange emphasizes a word rather than a single letter, whereas sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange emphasizes individual letters.
• In situations where the fonts are very small, sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts are usually clearer than Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts.

Suitable for different purposes

Generally, the content and main body of articles use Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts with better legibility, which can increase legibility. Moreover, because you will read in word units for a long time, you will be less likely to get tired. The words used in titles and tables use a more eye-catching sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange font. They need to be prominent and eye-catching, but you don’t have to stare at these words for a long time to read.

Like DMs and posters, in order to be eye-catching, the paragraphs of his short stories will also use sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts. However, in books, newspapers and magazines, when the text is quite long, Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts should be used to reduce the reading burden on readers.

Chinese situation

In Chinese, there are also fonts equivalent to Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange. For example, Ming (Song) font is Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange, and it is usually matched with the Times Roman font family. The bold and round fonts are equivalent to sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange fonts.

In the case of Chinese vertical layout, it is relatively difficult to show the difference between Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange/sans Comparison of serif fonts and sans-serif fonts_Experience exchange. However, in the current situation where Chinese horizontal layout is quite common, the above mentioned legibility and eye-catching properties are also applicable. in Chinese.

It is very common to see books and magazines published in Chinese. The text uses bold or round fonts that are difficult to read but very eye-catching. This can easily cause eye discomfort to readers after long-term reading. It seems that It should be avoided as much as possible.