MySQL vs MongoDB: Differences in data replication and failure recovery
Overview:
Data replication and failure recovery are two important concepts in database systems. In the traditional relational database MySQL and the non-relational database MongoDB, these two aspects are implemented differently. This article will focus on the differences between MySQL and MongoDB in data replication and failure recovery, and provide code examples to illustrate their differences.
MySQL data replication and failure recovery:
MySQL uses a technology called master-slave replication to achieve data replication and failure recovery. In master-slave replication, there is a master database (Master) and one or more slave databases (Slave). The master database is responsible for receiving and processing write operations, and then sending these operations to the slave database through the log (binlog). After operations from the primary database are received from the database, they are executed in the same order. In this way, the data in the slave database can be consistent with the master database.
In MySQL, the setting of master-slave replication is relatively complicated. It is necessary to configure relevant parameters on the master database and slave database, and ensure reliable network communication. The following is a simple MySQL master-slave replication configuration example:
Configure on the master database:
# 修改my.cnf配置文件 server-id=1 log-bin=mysql-bin
Configure on the slave database:
# 修改my.cnf配置文件 server-id=2
In MySQL, failure recovery also requires manual operations. If the master database crashes, a slave database needs to be manually promoted to the new master database. This requires stopping all database operations, followed by manual configuration and data synchronization.
MongoDB data replication and failure recovery:
Unlike MySQL, MongoDB uses a technology called replica set (Replica Set) to achieve data replication and failure recovery. In a replica set, there is a primary node (Primary) and multiple replica nodes (Secondary). The master node is responsible for receiving and processing write operations and sending these operations to the replica nodes. After the replica node receives the operations from the primary node, it will perform these operations in the same order. In this way, the data of the replica node can be consistent with that of the master node.
In MongoDB, setting up a replica set is relatively simple. Just specify the members of the replica set through commands or configuration files and start all nodes. The following is a simple MongoDB replica set configuration example:
Configuration on the primary node:
# 启动mongod,指定副本集名称和角色为Primary mongod --replSet myReplicaSet
Configuration on the replica node:
# 启动mongod,指定副本集名称和角色为Secondary mongod --replSet myReplicaSet
In MongoDB, failure recovery can be automated. If the primary node crashes, the replica set automatically conducts an election to select a new primary node to take over write operations. In this way, the entire process does not require manual intervention and does not affect the availability of the system.
Code sample:
The following is a simple code sample for MySQL and MongoDB data insertion:
MySQL sample code:
import mysql.connector # 连接MySQL数据库 cnx = mysql.connector.connect(user='username', password='password', host='localhost', database='mydb') # 创建游标 cursor = cnx.cursor() # 执行插入操作 query = "INSERT INTO mytable (name, age) VALUES (%s, %s)" data = ("John", 25) cursor.execute(query, data) # 提交事务 cnx.commit() # 关闭连接 cursor.close() cnx.close()
MongoDB sample code:
from pymongo import MongoClient # 连接MongoDB数据库 client = MongoClient('localhost', 27017) # 获取数据库和集合 db = client['mydb'] collection = db['mycollection'] # 执行插入操作 document = {"name": "John", "age": 25} collection.insert_one(document)
As can be seen from the comparison of the above sample codes, there are some differences between MySQL and MongoDB at the code level. MySQL needs to use a library to connect to the database, and then create a cursor to perform SQL operations; while MongoDB uses the pymongo library provided by Python to insert data directly by calling methods. This also reflects the characteristics of MySQL as a relational database and MongoDB as a non-relational database.
Conclusion:
MySQL and MongoDB have different implementations in data replication and failure recovery. MySQL uses master-slave replication to implement data replication and failure recovery, while MongoDB uses replica sets. There are differences in complexity of configuration and operation, degree of automation, etc. Developers and administrators can choose a database system that suits them based on actual needs.
The above is the detailed content of MySQL vs MongoDB: Differences in data replication and failure recovery. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!