Home > Web Front-end > JS Tutorial > body text

Introduction to several methods to implement JavaScript array merging

黄舟
Release: 2017-03-17 14:31:40
Original
1037 people have browsed it

This is a simple article about some tips on using JavaScript arrays. We will use different methods to combine/merge two JS arrays, as well as discuss the advantages/disadvantages of each method.

Let us first consider the following situation:

var a = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ];
var b = [ "foo", "bar", "baz", "bam", "bun", "fun" ];
Copy after login

Obviously the simplest combination result should be:

[
   1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
   "foo", "bar", "baz", "bam" "bun", "fun"
]
Copy after login

concat(..)

This is the most common approach:

var c = a.concat( b );
a; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
b; // ["foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
c; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
Copy after login

As you can see, C is a brand new array, representing the combination of two arrays a and b, and leaving A and B unchanged. Simple right?

But what if a has 10,000 elements and b also has 10,000 elements? C will have 20,000 elements, so the memory usage of a and b will double.

"No problem!", you said. Let them be garbage collected, set A and B to null, problem solved!

a = b = null; // 'a'和'b'就被回收了
Copy after login

Haha. For small arrays with only a few elements, this is no problem. But for large arrays, or in systems with limited memory that need to repeat this process frequently, it actually has a lot of room for improvement.

Loop insertion

Okay, let’s copy the contents of one array to another, using: Array#push(..)

// `b` onto `a`
for (var i=0; i < b.length; i++) {
    a.push( b[i] );
}
a; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
b = null;
Copy after login

Now, array a has the contents of array b.

seems to have a better memory footprint.

But what if array a is relatively small? For memory and speed reasons, you may want to put the smaller a in front of b. No problem, just replace push(..) with unshift(..):

// `a` into `b`:
for (var i=a.length-1; i >= 0; i--) {
    b.unshift( a[i] );
}
b; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
Copy after login

Functional skills

But for loop is really ugly, and Not easy to maintain. Can we do better?

This is our first try, using Array#reduce:

// `b` onto `a`:
a = b.reduce( function(coll,item){
    coll.push( item );
    return coll;
}, a );

a; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]

// or `a` into `b`:
b = a.reduceRight( function(coll,item){
    coll.unshift( item );
    return coll;
}, b );

b; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
Copy after login

Array#reduce(..) and Array#reduceRight(..) are nice, but they are a A little clumsy. ES6=>ArrowFunction will reduce the amount of code some, but it still requires a function that needs to be called once for each element, which is not perfect.

How about this one:

// `b` onto `a`:
a.push.apply( a, b );
a; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
// or `a` into `b`:
b.unshift.apply( b, a );
b; // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,"foo","bar","baz","bam","bun","fun"]
Copy after login

This one is much better, right? Especially since the unshift(..) method doesn't need to worry about the previous reverse sorting here. ES6's span operation will be more beautiful: a.push(...b) or b.unshift(...a

Maximum length limit of array

The first major problem is, memory usage The amount is doubled (of course only temporarily!) The appended content is basically copied to the stack through function calls. In addition, different JS engines have limitations on the length of the copied data.

So, if the array has a million elements, you will definitely exceed the limit of the call stack allowed for push(...) or unshift(...). Alas, it will do well with a few thousand elements, but you have to. Be careful not to exceed the reasonable length limit

Note: You can try splice(...), which has the same problem as push(...) and unshift(...)

There is a way to avoid this maximum length limit.

function combineInto(a,b) {
    var len = a.length;
    for (var i=0; i < len; i=i+5000) {
        b.unshift.apply( b, a.slice( i, i+5000 ) );
    }
}
Copy after login

Wait a minute, our readability will go backwards. It may get worse as we change it.

The above is the detailed content of Introduction to several methods to implement JavaScript array merging. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Related labels:
source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template
About us Disclaimer Sitemap
php.cn:Public welfare online PHP training,Help PHP learners grow quickly!